My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:54:49 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 12:57:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/7/2012
Doc Name
Wildlife Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the aid of a handheld global positioning system (GPS) receiver, utilizing NAD83 /WGS84 map <br />datum, with all coordinate locations based on the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) <br />coordinate system within Zone 12. <br />Pedestrian surveys of the biological resources area were conducted to identify and locate wildlife <br />species, wildlife sign (tracks, fecal droppings, and vegetation disturbance), vegetation <br />communities and wildlife habitats (Appendix A). Vegetation types were determined through <br />field identification of plants, aerial photography, and on- the - ground assessments of plant <br />abundance. Identification of plant species was aided by using the Colorado Flora: Western Slope <br />field guide (Weber and Wittman 2001). <br />Mammals: <br />• Mule Deer: Visual surveys were conducted throughout the project area to determine <br />potential mule deer use in the area. The general surveys took into account observations <br />of the number of pellet groups, tracks, observation of animals and subjective level of <br />browsing on shrub forage species. CDOW information were used to gather additional <br />information on wild ungulate use in the area including NDIS map references and Data <br />Analysis Use Plans. <br />• Predatory Mammals: Surveys for these species included observation of tracks and fecal <br />droppings. Literature reviews were conducted as well as the personal knowledge of the <br />area by the biologist conducting surveys. <br />• Small Mammals <br />■ Rodents and Lagomorphs: Visual pedestrian surveys were conducted <br />specifically to detect these species. Incidental observations made during other <br />surveys were recorded. <br />Birds: <br />• Raptors: Visual searches for raptor and other bird species nests focused on tamarisk <br />thickets and isolated Russian olive trees that are found in the project area. Nest searches <br />and bird identification were aided with the use of binoculars and song recognition, where <br />needed. <br />• Passerine Species: Since the project area is relatively small, surveys could effectively <br />cover the entire proposed development area. Two line - transects (east and west of Reed <br />Wash) and spot mapping techniques were used to determine species diversity, estimate <br />breeding bird distribution and locations of potential breeding territories within and in <br />areas adjacent to potentially affected areas (Appendix A). Casual observations of <br />suspected nesting territories and indicators of breeding birds were recorded during <br />pedestrian surveys conducted to gather information for other wildlife species. <br />• Waterfowl: Identification of species, numbers and areas of use were recorded when <br />waterfowl were observed or flushed during field surveys. <br />Reptiles: Lizard and snake populations were surveyed by walking transects throughout the <br />project area. Surveys included the greasewood shrublands and the riparian corridor along Reed <br />Wash. Reptiles were also recorded as encountered in conjunction with bird and mammal <br />surveys. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.