Laserfiche WebLink
National Cooperative Soil Survey (Soil Survey Staff, 1993 and 1999; and Schoeneberger <br />et. al., 2002). Because the DRMS does not have a detailed guideline with specifications <br />for conducting a baseline soil resource assessment, reference is made to the current <br />Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) Guideline No.1 "Topsoil and <br />Overburden" (WDEQ, 1996). <br />At the direction of J.E. Stover, the existing constructed "land farms" area in the eastern <br />and southeastern parts of the project area, as well as Reed Wash and any wetlands that <br />may be present, were excluded from the baseline soil survey (Stover, 2010). The "land <br />farms" are mapped as Disturbed Land (Map Unit DL), and the incised Reed Wash <br />drainage channel bottomland and any adjacent wetlands are mapped as Reed Wash <br />(Map Unit RW). The "land farms" were separately sampled and analyzed. <br />The soils scope -of -work was similar to that for the previously completed CAM - Colorado <br />Red Cliff Mine soil survey, as discussed with Mr. Dan Mathews (DRMS) in early April, <br />2006. Mr. Mathews had written: "An Order I or II survey intensity will be required for all <br />potentially disturbed surface areas for mapping purposes." (Mathews, 2006a). This is <br />consistent with specifications of WDEQ Guideline No. 1, as described on pages 2 and 3 of <br />that guideline, which further states that nonaffected areas be mapped less intensively to <br />the Order III level (WDEQ, 1996). <br />All major soils on proposed affected areas were fully described and sampled for <br />laboratory analysis a minimum of one time each. Based on previous experience with <br />similar coal mine related projects, this sampling intensity is consistent with previous <br />recommendations for proposed affected area disturbances on other projects in Colorado <br />and other western states. The amount of additional soil sampling, beyond the minimum, is <br />left to the professional judgement of the certified soil scientist. For the approximate 103 - <br />acre project area, a total of 3 representative soil sites were sampled by major horizons <br />and subhorizons for laboratory characterization. A total of 12 soil samples were collected <br />from the 3 sample sites. <br />The soil samples were delivered to Inter - Mountain Laboratories, Inc. in Sheridan, <br />Wyoming, for standard soils analysis. The laboratory analysis included the following <br />parameters: pH; saturation percent; electrical conductivity (EC); calcium (Ca), magnesium <br />(Mg), and sodium (Na) (meq/L); calculation of sodium adsorption ratio (SAR); organic <br />matter percent (Walkley -Black method); soil texture (percent sand, silt, and clay), and iron <br />(ppm by AB -DTPA method). Based on previous conversation with Mr. Mathews, <br />Selenium and Boron (ppm) were added to the laboratory analysis (Mathews, 2006b). The <br />results of the laboratory analysis were reported on June 18, 2010, and are included with <br />this report. A 10% duplicate analysis was conducted for quality assurance /quality control <br />(QA/QC) purposes, and the results are on file at IML. <br />Concerning soils mapping, initial mapping units were identified using Natural Resources <br />and Conservation Service (NRCS) Order 3 soil survey map (Spears and Kleven, 1978), <br />2 Exhibit 7 — 2010 Train Loadout Soil Survey <br />