My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (32)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (32)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:13 PM
Creation date
3/7/2012 8:16:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/6/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 25 Bonding
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ti <br />• CHAPTER 25 <br />BONDING <br />Introduction <br />The purpose of this chapter is to provide a reclamation cost estimate, with supporting documentation, <br />for determination of a reclamation performance bond for lands disturbed at Seneca's Seneca II-W Mine. <br />This document will provide information regarding all disturbed lands within the proposed permit <br />boundary. The amount of bond required was developed assuming that the bond would be forfeited at a <br />time when reclamation liabilities are highest within the five-year permit term (2001-20051. This <br />condition is most likely to occur at the stage in the mining sequence when the area from which topsoil <br />has been removed is largest and the volume of material to backfill the open pit areas is greatest. This <br />usually occurs when the pit lengths are the longest and the overburden is the thickest. <br />It was determined from the Operations Plan discussion and Map (submitted in PR-041 that the highest <br />liability, or worst-case condition, would occur in the year 2005. With the submittal of PR-05, the year <br />(timeframe) consisting of the worst-case condition does not change. However, the amount of open pit <br />• does reduce significantly. Dudng the 1" quarter of 2005, approximately 3,100 feet of open pit <br />(scheduled for backfilling in 2005) have already been completely backfilled leaving only about 3,600 <br />feet to be completed. The amount of open pit is being reduced on a daily basis with four dozers <br />dedicated to the reclamation on a continual basis. Based on the Operations Plan and the Backfilling and <br />Grading Plan the amount of reclamation liability will significantly decrease annually until completed. <br />Details of topsoil replacement and timing (including topsoil volume) are shown in Tab 22. This <br />determination was based on pit length, pit location, amount of box cut spoil, and disturbance ahead and <br />behind mining. The Cost Summary Formisl are attached at the end of this tab. <br />"Worst Case" Year Disturbance <br />Included in this category are the four spoil piles, open pit, areas ahead of mining that have been stripped <br />of topsoil, ramps, and miscellaneous disturbance areas in and around the open pit. Estimated costs to <br />reclaim the disturbed area come under the headings of: <br />a) Drill and shoot highwall <br />bl Doze highwall material <br />c) Doze adjacent two spoils <br />• d) <br />l Doze back two spoils <br />Grade all ram <br />s (included in s <br />oil <br />radin <br />) <br />e p <br />g <br />g <br />p <br />f) Topsoil replacement <br />g) Revegetation <br />PR-05 <br />1 <br />Revised 05/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.