My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 10:21:26 AM
Creation date
3/7/2012 8:08:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/6/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 17 Probable Hydrologic Consequences
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• will be certain short-term impacts to the channel reach below the structure. Sediment <br />loads will temporarily increase as the active channel widens in response to increased <br />runoff potential, Revegetation of the removed embankment and pond area will provide <br />stability during the readjustment period of the active channel. The frequency of the <br />larger runoff events will dictate how fast the channels reestablish to quasi equilibrium <br />with the fluvial system in this tributary to Sage Creek. The impacts of the 009 pond <br />following its removal will last a relatively short time until the active <br />channel readjusts, and reclamation efforts within the removed embankment and ponding area <br />will greatly assist in minimizing these impacts. <br />An alluvial valley floor (AVF) analysis of Dry Creek and Sage Creek was performed and the <br />results of the analysis are presented in Tab 76, Protection of the Hydrologic Balance. <br />The analysis determined that only small areas within each drainage that are limited in <br />extent satisfy requirements for designating areas as AVF`s. Significant observations made <br />in the analysis included the determination that increases in receiving stream water <br />quality (Dry and Sage Creeks) resulting from pond discharges greatly influenced by spoil <br />water chemistry will not significantly affect any existing and potential use of these <br />waters for flood irrigation. In fact, the presence of saline seeps in the lower portions <br />of each drainage will mask any increases in TDS resulting from pond discharges from the <br />Seneca II-W Mine. Discharges from the ponds will likely serve to slightly increase <br />basef low magnitudes and durations; however, due to the incised nature of the stream <br />channels downstream along both drainages, slight increases in basef low will not improve <br />any potential for flood irrigation. Finally, most of the small areas which can be <br />characterized as AVF's within both drainages do not presently depend upon direct diversion <br />of water from either Dry or Sage Creeks, with the exception of small areas in lower Dry <br />Creek (Sections 22 and 10, T6N, RBllw). <br />A previous section within this Tab titled "Potential Impact of Replaced Spoil on Surface <br />Yla ter Ouality" discusses the potential impact of spoil water discharge on Dry Creek <br />tributaries, Dry Creek, a tributary to Sage Creek, and Sage Creek. A mass balance <br />approach was used to assess potential increases in chemical loads and TDS concentrations <br />occurring from water that will discharge from replaced spoil material at the Seneca II-W <br />Mine. The analysis assumed that spoil water will mix directly with surface rva ter flows in <br />Dry Creek and Sage Creek. TDS and flow values used in the analyses were obtained from <br />• monitoring records or reasonable estimates of chemical and flow parameters during the <br />irrigation season (June through September). <br />59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.