My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 10:11:47 AM
Creation date
3/6/2012 10:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/6/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 11 WILDLIFE
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIES OF CONCERN <br />• Table 11-45 lists the vertebrate species of concern that could potentially occur in the extension <br />area. This list includes possible residents as well as species that could migrate through the <br />' area. For each species, information is provided regarding habitat potential, expected frequency <br />of occurrence, State rank, and any Federal or State status. <br />Nine of the species on Table 11-45 have been observed on or near the extension area. This <br />includes species listed as observed during previous Seneca II-W baseline studies. No suitable <br />breeding habitat is present for two of the nine species observed: the great blue heron, Ardea <br />herodias (riparian woodlandsl, and northern goshawk (coniferous forestl. Breeding by four <br />other species is known or probable. As previously noted, sharp-shinned hawks nested on the <br />area in 1997, and northern harriers, Cooper's hawks, and golden eagles were likely nesters. <br />Breeding potential for the remaining three species of concern; sandhill crane (Grus canadensisl, <br />loggerhead shrike (Lanius /udovicianusl, and northern leopard frog /Rana pipiens) is uncertain. <br />Bottomland habitat along Hubberson Gulch could support breeding leopard frogs. Beaver ponds <br />maintain water in the drainage year-round. There is a possibility that sandhill cranes could I <br />occupy such habitat as well, or even other bottomland areas. A vegetation ecologist reported a <br />pair of sandhill cranes frequenting the vicinity of the upland ponds in the SW'/. SE Y., Section <br />27 and NW'/. NE%., Section 34 in July 1997 (D. Buckner, personal communicationl. However, <br />• no young birds were seen with the adults. Breeding pairs of sandhill cranes have been <br />observed in isolated high-elevation drainages several miles east of the extension area, on and <br />adjacent [o the Seneca II Mine affected area IPRES 1996a1. There is a remote possibility that <br />sandhill cranes could nest off the eastern or western margins of the extension area. <br />The loggerhead shrike was recorded during previous baseline studies at the Seneca II-W Mine. <br />Mountain brush habitat interspersed with open foraging areas would seem to be suitable <br />breeding habitat for loggerhead shrikes. However, none were observed during an extensive <br />1993 baseline study in very similar habitat a few miles northeast of the expansion area ISCC's <br />Yoast property; PRES, 19941. A specific three-day survey of that same area in June 1996 also <br />failed to locate any shrikes IPRES, 1996b1. <br />Apart from the sandhill crane, which was discussed above, no Federally-listed or State-listed <br />threatened or endangered species would be expected to breed on the extension area. As noted <br />above, no nesting habitat for peregrine falcons exists on or adjacent to the area, and bald <br />eagles are solely winter residents or transients of nearby large drainages. Ferruginous hawks <br />might pass over the area during migration, but this species typically nests in lower elevation <br />rangelands, not in foothills shrublands. The wolverine IGulo gu/ol and lynx (Lynx /ynxl <br />potentially occur in the mountains of northwest Colorado, but are likely extirpated from the <br />. area. Both species are wide-ranging, and it is possible that individuals might move through or <br />reoccupy the region at some point in time. <br />39 Revised 9/98 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.