My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_INSPECTION - M2001097
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M2001097
>
2012-02-28_INSPECTION - M2001097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:06 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 9:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001097
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
The Fort Lyon Canal Company
Inspection Date
2/23/2012
Email Name
SJR
TAK
SJM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OBSERVATIONS <br />PERMIT #: M- 2001 -097 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: SJR <br />INSPECTION DATE: February 23, 2012 <br />This was a normal monitoring inspection of the Fort Lyon State Pit No. 1, DRMS file number M- 2001 -097. This <br />site is located approximately 4 miles northeast of Mc Clave, Colorado in Bent County. I, Stephanie Reigh of the <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety conducted the inspection. Mr. Manuel Torres of Fort <br />Lyon Canal Company accompanied me on the inspection. <br />The proper mine identification sign was in place. The permit boundaries were clearly marked with survey <br />stakes with aluminum cap. The site consists of 44.5 acres, but only 7 acres is currently disturbed. <br />The current excavation is located in the western portion of the permit area. The site was not active at the <br />time of inspection and there was no equipment at the site. Mining consists of excavators digging to a depth of <br />2 -3 feet of limestone. The ideal limestone is large blocks to line the Fort Lyon Canal. There were several <br />stockpiles in the main pit floor. Water was also present in the southwest corner of the pit. The water was <br />from snow melt, not groundwater. <br />All other activities and completed work at the time of inspection appeared to follow the guidelines and <br />regulations set forth by the state and in the mining and reclamation plans for the pit. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.