My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2012-02-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:48:48 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 2:29:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/21/2012
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review No. 3 (Part 1 of 3)
From
Western Fuels Association, Inc
To
DRMS
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
spillway up to the Proposed Emergency Spillway Elevation and is required to be at least as large as the total 10- <br />year, 24 hour runoff volume. Table 3 shows storage volume calculations for each pond. Figures 2, 3 and 4 <br />display the pond designs for NHN -001, NHN -002, and NHN -003 respectively. <br />The sediment storage is calculated assuming an annual R value of 20.0 for one (1) year. Thus each pond <br />requires maintenance and sediment removal at a minimum of once a year and after every major storm event. <br />Required sediment storage volume calculations are based on the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation. <br />Sedimentation Pond Outlet Controls <br />There are three types of principal spillways commonly used: open channel, drop inlet and pipe culvert. <br />Considering the flexibility of control and modification, an 18 inch diameter pipe with a 6 inch diameter control <br />valve was chosen for all ponds, allowing the New Horizon North Mine to selectively drain each pond after <br />sediment has had adequate settling time. All three ponds are assumed to have 18 inch diameter outfall pipes, <br />though larger pipes are an option. The valve is located at the end of pipe inlet, controlled by a wheel on the pond <br />embankment as the example shown in Figure 5. The 6" valve shown in the picture is used to dewater pond once <br />water is clear enough to discharge and meet effluent levels. <br />The slope and length of pipes are listed in the Table 2. SEDCAD calculated these pipe sizes assuming gravity <br />flow, though pressure flow scenarios are likely with a manually operated drain valve on each pond. The outflow <br />pipe bottom should be positioned between 0.5 ft to 1.0 ft above the top of the sediment storage elevation, which is <br />5676.6, 5676.0 and 5686.0 feet for ponds NHN -001, NHN -002 and NHN -003 respectively, assuming the release <br />is slow as suggested by the SEDCAD manual. <br />Two proposed emergency spillway elevations are listed in Table 3 for each pond. The first listed elevation for <br />each pond in Table 3 is 18 inches below the top of embankment and the second elevation is two feet below the <br />top of embankment. For all ponds, it is recommended that an emergency spillway elevation of 18 inches below <br />the top of embankment be constructed to allow for extra pond capacity. In the case where no additional capacity <br />is necessary, spillway elevations of two feet below the top of embankment may also be constructed. These <br />designs are highlighted in bold in Table 3. Each pond includes 10% or more excess capacity with the proposed <br />emergency spillways and should capture any additional known flows, such as volume pumped into ponds from <br />the mining pit. The design alternative of an 18 inch emergency spillway depth is included in the case that <br />additional pond capacity is preferred. NHN -001, NHN -002 and NHN -003 include an emergency spillway design of <br />18 inches. <br />Each emergency spillway is designed with a 10 foot bottom width and 2:1 side - slopes on each side. A typical <br />emergency spillway cross - section is shown in Figure 6. The crest length will vary depending on the elevation of <br />the emergency spillway compared to the top of embankment. <br />Erosion control below spillways is necessary to provide protection downstream of spillways and nearby structures. <br />The appropriate anti - piping barriers will be used on the primary discharge pipes that extend through the <br />embankment per Rule 4.05.9(2). <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.