My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-07_PERMIT FILE - M2011054
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2011054
>
2012-02-07_PERMIT FILE - M2011054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:48:26 PM
Creation date
2/16/2012 7:25:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011054
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/7/2012
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Oldcastle Sw Group, Inc.
Email Name
THM
SSS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />February 7, 2012 <br />Dear Mr. Banks: <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />Peter J. Siegmund <br />Oldcastle Southwest Group, Inc. d.b.a. United Companies <br />2273 River Road <br />Grand Junction, CO 81502 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />—&— <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />Re: Debeque Sand and Gravel Resource, Application No. M- 2011 -054, Second Adequacy Review <br />of 112 Construction Materials Reclamation Permit Application Package <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has begun the review process for the above referenced <br />112 Construction Materials Reclamation Permit Application. A review of the application has revealed a <br />few clarifications and issues that need to be addressed. <br />1) Response is adequate and as a result of the water model report and monitoring and mitigation plan <br />submitted the requirement for five quarters of baseline water level monitoring has been lifted. <br />2) Response is adequate. <br />3) Response is adequate. <br />4) Response is adequate. <br />5) Response is adequate. <br />6) Response is adequate. <br />7) Response is adequate. <br />8) The revised maps submitted are technically acceptable; however, the maps must be signed and <br />dated by the mapmaker. <br />9) Response is adequate please review enclosed reclamation cost estimate. <br />10) Response is adequate. <br />11) Response is adequate. <br />12) Response is adequate. <br />13) Response is adequate. <br />Office of Office of <br />Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.