My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (18)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:13 PM
Creation date
2/13/2012 10:38:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/6/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 06 Geology and Overburden Assessment
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusions. Overburden characteristics at the Seneca II-W Mine reflect the variable depositional • <br />environments of the coal-bearing strata of the Williams Fork Formation. Although lateral and vertical <br />variability exist, certain distinct physiochemical differences are apparent between some of the core <br />holes, especially for the parameters pH, saturation percent, conductivity, sulfate, nitrate-nitrogen, sand <br />content, clay content, and manganese. As discussed in the Mixing and Mitigation of Unsuitable <br />Overburden section and Tab 21, Minesoil Reconstruction, none of these parameters will impact overall <br />spoil suitability. In most instances, avoidance and typical overburden handling will effectively blend, <br />dilute, bury, and mitigate potentially inimical zones as documented in Appendix 6-5. <br />SCC will continue to sample all graded spoil on the 500-foot grid to determine spoil/subsoil suitability <br />prior to topsoil replacement. Any unsuitable spoil encountered will be handled according to the <br />"Unsuitable Spoil Mitigation Plan" described in Tab 21, Minesoil Reconstruction. Typical overburden <br />handling and reclamation monitoring will effectively mitigate any unsuitable or marginally suitable zones. <br />The sampling plan and mitigative measures are discussed in further detail in Tab 21, Minesoil <br />Reconstruction. <br />Coal Quality. Table 6-8, Coal Seam Analysis, summarizes the quality of the Lennox, Wadge, Sage Creek <br />and Wolf Creek coal seams of the Seneca II-W Mine. Specific analysis for the mineral marcasite was • <br />deemed unnecessary as marcasite content is included as part of the total sulfur (pyritic) content. <br />• <br />TR-50 40 Revised 07/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.