My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (18)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-01-06_PERMIT FILE - C1982057 (18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:13 PM
Creation date
2/13/2012 10:38:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/6/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 06 Geology and Overburden Assessment
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sandstone is 130 feet. Above the Twentymile sandstone is the upper unit of the Williams Fork <br />Formation. This unit, exposed to the west of the permit area, consists of sandstones, shales, <br />and thin coals. <br />The Quaternary age deposits within the permit area consist of thin alluvial (Exhibit 6-1 and 6- <br />1 B) and colluvial deposits. During the course of mining and facility construction there have <br />been areas of surfical instability encountered on the steeper or saturated slopes usually <br />associated with final pits prior to backfilling or haulroad construction. Stabilization of these <br />areas is generally accomplished by avoidance, pit backfilling, or slope reduction. Site specific <br />remediation/stabilization measures are implemented on as needed situations. The areas of <br />instability are shown on Exhibit 6-1B and in Attachments 13-3A, 3B, 4A, 4B and 4D. <br />There are not any outcrops of Miocene extrusive igneous rock nor any evidence of intrusive <br />rocks at the mine site. <br />Overburden Assessment <br />The original overburden samples obtained from the Seneca II-W Mine study area were analyzed <br />to identify any acid-forming, toxic-forming, alkalinity producing, or other inhibitory materials <br />associated with the Wadge seam mining area. Physical properties of the overburden were <br />determined to define compaction, stability, permeability, erodibility, and water holding <br />characteristics. Chemical and physical analyses also reveal the most desirable overburden <br />strata to be placed at the spoil surface and in the pit base. This baseline information is <br />required prior to mining to effectively prepare a mine plan that restores landscape productivity <br />and which also minimizes environmental degradation. <br />Now that SCC has decided to mine select areas of the Sage Creek and Wolf Creek seams, a generalized <br />overburden assessment was conducted. SCC has no overburden suitability analyses from the specific <br />area proposed for mining. However, in August 2001 Seneca drilled a monitoring well (WWCU-24) <br />approximately 1,600 feet down dip (west) of the proposed mining area to monitor ground water from <br />the Wolf Creek underburden. During drilling, overburden chip samples were collected to further assess <br />the overburden characteristics in the Sage Creek/Wolf Creek mining area. The sample intervals <br />collected represented the Sage Creek overburden, the Wolf Creek overburden and the Wolf Creek <br />underburden. <br />Although the overburden samples were collected from only one locale outside the proposed mining area <br />and therefore may not represent the actual overburden characteristics of the entire proposed mining <br />area, these analysis results were used in conjunction with the overburden assessment at the Yoast <br />Mine to estimate reclamation suitability of the Sage Creek/Wolf Creek overburden material. <br />The Yoast Mine Permit, Tab 21, Minesoil Reconstruction, indicated that..... <br />PR04 8 Revised 04/02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.