My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-23_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057A
>
2012-01-23_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 9:10:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/23/2012
Doc Name
Pond 016 Slide Remediation Plans
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 20 Attachment 20-E
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
competent bedrock materials or until practical rig refusal is encountered. The test trench/pits should daylight <br />into Pond 16 and will assist in providing temporary dewatering of the slope. We also recommend that the <br />groundwater levels in the test holes/wells be monitored as the trench/pits are constructed and for at least six <br />additional months after the trench/pits have been constructed. <br />We believe that the information obtained from test trench/pits will allow us to design a cost effective <br />underdrain/cutoff trench that should adequately dewater the slide area In addition, we believe that the test <br />trench/pits can be incorporated into the final underdrain/cutoff trench design. We recommend that the drain <br />system consist of a 6-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe that is surrounded with free draining gravels. The <br />actual location and dimensions of the underdrain/cutoff trench will be determined after the bedrock and <br />groundwater information from the test trench/pits is obtained. <br />We believe that the most feasible method for stabilizing the failed slope is to construct a well drained earthen <br />buttress fill at the toe of the slope failure and removing the fill materials that have been placed along the upper <br />portions of the slope failure and in the old haul road alignment. However, this construction cannot occur until <br />the failure area has had time to drain and the existing fill materials and overburden soils are dried out. <br />is The earthen buttress fill materials should consist of the on-site soils and bedrock fill materials that are situated <br />near the top of the failed area. The fill materials placed in the-buttress fill should be compacted to at least 95% <br />of the maximum standard Proctor density and within 3 percent of the optimum moisture content. It appears <br />that the existing fill materials and underlying natural soils presently range from 5 to 15 percent over the <br />optimum moisture content and as noted above will have to be dried out before they can be used as fill <br />materials. <br />Ideally, the new embankment materials should be keyed into the underlying claystone-shale bedrock materials <br />that are situated approximately 14 to 33 feet beneath the existing ground surface in the lower portion of the <br />failed area. However, based on the depth to competent bedrock and the lack of stability of the existing fill <br />materials and underlying natural soils, it may not be feasible to properly key in the new fill materials; <br />therefore, the client should consider abandoning the existing roadway that crosses the slide area and consider <br />constructing a new roadway along the southern side of Pond 16. If this alternate is opted for, the required site <br />grading would consist primarily of the removal of the existing fill materials and a portion of the natural <br />overburden soils. <br />f, J <br />Job Number. 08-8099 NWCC, Inc. Page 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.