My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-01_REVISION - M2010049
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2012-02-01_REVISION - M2010049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:51:34 PM
Creation date
2/6/2012 3:07:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/1/2012
Doc Name
Submittal
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tract D <br />There are no gas wells locate within Tract D that could be exposed to head cutting, therefore protection <br />of Tract D is not a priority. Using the USACE hydraulic analyses, the site is likely to overtop along the <br />Tract D berm during a 100 year event at cross section 22471, with a maximum flow depth over the berm <br />of approximately 0.4 ft and a maximum flow velocity of approximately 2.3 ft/sec. In this area the <br />proposed berm elevation for Tract C is approximately 4625, a foot higher than the proposed berm for <br />Tract D, and 0.7 ft higher than the expected WSEL, so no flow is expected to enter Tract C. In addition, <br />the two pits are separated by a drainage channel, so overtopping of Tract D is unlikely to adversely <br />affect Tract C. <br />Permissible velocities for the berm if it is topped by grass range from 2 -4 ft/sec depending on the <br />species of grass and time of year (Schwab, 1993, USDOT 2001, pg 6.51). Maximum permissible velocities <br />for the in situ soil (partially cohesive silty clay with sand) range from 1.5 ft/sec to 3 ft/sec (Julien, 2002). <br />Based on an expected overtopping velocity of 2.3 ft /sec, the berm should be allowed to remain <br />vegetated to prevent erosion. <br />Recommended Action <br />Based on the analysis above, the following measures are recommended. <br />Tract C- There are two gas wells of concern in Tract C. <br />• Provide an armored weir with 1 ft of flow depth and 330 ft width at elevation 4629 NGVD <br />upstream of the drop structure to convey and guide possible overtopping flows away from <br />critical infrastructure. <br />• Allow erosion of the interior pit walls during an overtopping event, but repair damaged areas <br />after the event, particularly in the area of the weir. <br />• After pit excavation is complete, provide rip -rap or other protection at the slope transition <br />within the pit if the water level is not at least 2 feet above this point (Approximately 28 feet <br />from the existing ground elevation) <br />Tract D- There are no gas well of concern in Tract D. <br />• Allow Tract D to overtop during the 100 year event since there is no threat to critical <br />infrastructure. <br />• Maintain existing vegetation or hydroseed to encourage vegetation establishment after <br />excavation to help control erosion on the top of the berm in an overtopping event. <br />• No armoring is necessary on the interior of the pit. <br />71Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.