My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-27_REPORT - M1973021
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1973021
>
2012-01-27_REPORT - M1973021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:48:02 PM
Creation date
1/30/2012 1:14:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
1/27/2012
Doc Name
Annual Report and Geotechnical Addendum
From
Tetra Tech for AI
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A secondary joint set is evident in this area and exhibits an average strike of <br />140 degrees with an average dip of 57 degrees northeast. <br />Small blocks may form in this area due to the orientation of the highwall and jointsets of <br />the rock. These blocks are anticipated to be limited in size, and should be retained on the <br />bench below the highwall. Due to the moderately to highly fractured nature of the rock, <br />raveling is to be expected in this area. Raveling from this zone should be retained on the <br />bench below the highwall and is anticipated to cause only local operational delays. <br />• Stations 1 +10 through 1 +75 consisted of moderately fractured biotitic gneiss. <br />The foliation strike in this area varies due to minor folding averages 350 <br />degrees with an average measured dip of 70 degrees southwest. The average <br />measured dip is not representative of the overall highwall and was measured at <br />a discrete location due to highwall configuration and safety concerns. The <br />average dip for the entire highwall is likely much lower. Foliation spacing <br />ranges approximately 4 inches to more than 2 feet, and foliation apertures were <br />tight and slightly rough to very rough. The primary joint set strike averages <br />125 degrees and with an average dip of 68 degrees northeast. A second primary <br />joint set strike averages 205 degrees and with an average dip of 85 degrees <br />southeast. The spacing of the primary joint sets varied widely, but averaged <br />approximately 18 inches. Joint apertures were tight to moderately open with <br />slightly rough to rough faces. <br />Small blocks may form in this area due to the orientation of the highwall and jointsets of <br />the rock. Discontinuities commonly dip out of the highwall indicating an increased chance <br />of raveling. These blocks are anticipated to be limited in size, and should be retained on <br />the bench below the highwall. Due to the moderately to highly fractured nature of the <br />rock, raveling is to be expected in this area. Raveling from this zone should be retained on <br />the bench below the highwall and is anticipated to cause only local operational delays. <br />• Stations 1 +75 through 3 +05 were unmappable due to overburden and rock <br />cover. The condition of the highwall is unknown in this section. <br />Due to the height of the highwall on bench 7250, special care should be taken to avoid <br />raveling from high on the highwall that could potentially extend 25 feet or more from the <br />highwall toe. <br />Figure 6 is a photo documentary of the features observed in Bench 7250. <br />Bench 6700 <br />The Bench 6700 scanline is approximately 1380 feet long and was separated into 5 discrete <br />sections. The approximate orientation of the highwall varies between is 30 degrees (north <br />30 degrees east) and 325 degrees (north 35 degrees west). This scanline replaces the <br />scanline conducted at this elevation for the 2010 Annual Report. <br />- 7 - <br />Morrison Quarry Annual Report 2011 <br />P \235I4 \133- 23514 - 12002\ Deliverables\Deliv -01- Annual Report \Annual_Report_20I l_Geotech.doc <br />January 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.