My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-23_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2012-01-23_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:45 PM
Creation date
1/25/2012 1:55:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/23/2012
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
CAM-Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the acid sludge landfill was selected as a fourth monitoring well. This monitoring well, RW -2, is <br />located northeast of the acid sludge landfill. See Map 8, Hydrologic Monitoring Location Map, <br />in the PAP for the location of the monitoring wells. <br />Two of the alluvial wells are located within the permit boundary, RW -1 and RW -2. RW -2 is <br />located in the northeast corner of the permit area. RW -1 is located in the central portion of the <br />permit area east of Reed Wash. RW -3 and RW -4 are both located south of the permit boundary <br />and east of Reed Wash. RW -3 is near Reed Wash. RW -4 is located approximately 1,800 feet <br />east of Reed Gulch. A typical completion diagram along with a summary table of specific <br />completion information for each monitoring well is located in Volume I, Exhibit 3 of the PAP. <br />The As -Built Drawings from 1981 when the wells were drilled and completed are provided in <br />Volume I, Exhibit 14, Appendix B. The number designations for the monitoring wells now <br />being utilized have changed somewhat since they were originally installed. The typical <br />completion diagram in Exhibit 3 provides the most current and best available information for the <br />four active monitoring wells RW -1 through RW -4. <br />CAM collected baseline groundwater quality data during all four quarters of 2010. These data <br />are also provided in Exhibit 3 of the PAP. Ground water was encountered by the four <br />monitoring wells in the saturated alluvial material overlying the low permeability Mancos Shale. <br />The depth to water in the four wells is currently either in the lowest portion of the silty clay layer <br />or within the alluvium (ranging from about 11 to 20 feet). Ground water elevations, as measured <br />in the four monitoring wells in June 2010, indicate the ground water flow direction is from <br />northeast to southwest towards the Colorado River with a shallow gradient of approximately <br />.003. The approximate elevation of the Colorado River is 4440 to 4441 feet above MSL, <br />compared to ground water elevations of (RW -2) 4461 at the north end of the property to (RW -3) <br />4448 at the south end of the property. Given that the ground water flow direction is towards the <br />river from the, upland areas to the north and the river is several feet lower in elevation than the <br />June ground water elevations, it is unlikely that the ground water beneath the proposed loadout <br />facility is directly related to the Colorado River. It is possible that ground water beneath the <br />property may, in part, be the result of irrigation in the upland areas, using water from up river <br />diversions. <br />The water quality of the alluvial ground water beneath the property indicates that the alluvial <br />ground water originated in the Mancos Shale or at least traveled through the Mancos Shale. The <br />alluvial ground water quality is typical of ground water quality of marine shales in western <br />Colorado. Total dissolved solids (TDS) range from 5,800 to 8,800 mg/L, with an average of <br />7,300 mg/L for the four monitoring wells. The water is predominantly a calcium- sodium sulfate <br />water with elevated levels of dissolved manganese and iron. When compared to Regulation No. <br />41, The Basic Standards For Groundwater all four monitoring wells had exceedances of the <br />Table 2 Domestic Water Supply Drinking Water Standards and Table 3 Agricultural Standards <br />for dissolved manganese and two of the wells R2 and R4 had exceedances in the second quarter <br />of the Domestic Water Supply Drinking Water Standards for dissolved iron. Samples from one <br />well (R2) exceeded the Agricultural Standard for selenium all four quarters. For TDS <br />comparison, the Colorado River upstream and downstream of the property had total dissolved <br />solids of about 600 mg/L in June 2010 whereas the groundwater data from the monitoring wells <br />show much higher levels averaging 7,300 mg/L. Detailed water quality information is presented <br />in Volume I, Exhibit 3. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.