Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Andy Rodriguez, P.E. Page 5 of 5 <br />Bestway's Brighton Combined SWSP <br />January 11, 2012 <br />13. This substitute water supply plan may be revoked or modified at any time should it be <br />determined that injury to other water rights has or will occur as a result of this plan. <br />Should this substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or be revoked prior to <br />adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all excavation of product from below <br />the water table, and all other use of water at the pit, must cease immediately. <br />14. Dewatering at this site will produce delayed depletions to the stream system. As long as <br />the pit is continuously dewatered, the water returned to the stream system should be <br />adequate to offset the depletions attributable to the dewatering operation. If dewatering <br />at the site ceases, the delayed depletions must be addressed. At least three years prior <br />to completion of dewatering, a plan must be submitted that specifies how the post <br />pumping dewatering depletions (including refilling of the pit) will be replaced, in time, <br />place and amount. <br />15. To assure that depletions from groundwater evaporation do not occur in the unforeseen <br />event, or events, that would lead to the abandonment of the pits, the applicant, through <br />DRMS, holds a bond in the amount of $974,000.00 for the Parker - Dersham Pit and <br />$711,750.00 for the Baseline Pit for lining or backfilling of the pit has been obtained. <br />Therefore, in case of abandonment the bond can finance the completion of the lining of <br />the pit or the backfilling, thus preventing depletions to the stream system. <br />16. In accordance with amendments to Section §25 -8- 202 -(7), C.R.S. and "Senate Bill 89 -181 <br />Rules and Regulations" adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine if <br />this substitute water supply plan is of a quality to meet requirements of use to which the <br />senior appropriation receiving the substitute supply has normally been put. As such, water <br />quality data or analyses may be requested at any time to determine if the requirement of <br />use of the senior appropriator is met. <br />17. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall <br />not create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any <br />water court case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the substitute <br />water supply plan. This decision shall not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar <br />manner in any other applications involving other plans or in any proposed renewal of this <br />plan, and shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law <br />contained herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />Should you have any questions, please contact Joanna Williams of this office or Jonathan <br />Hernandez of our Division office in Greeley at (970) 352 -0742. <br />Sincerely, <br />G. Rein, P.E. <br />y State Engineer <br />Attachments: Tables 1 through 3 <br />Figure 1 <br />cc: Jonathan Hernandez, Water Resource Engineer, (810 9 Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, Colorado 80631, <br />(970)- 352 -8712) <br />William Schneider, Water Commissioner District 2 (810 9 Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, Colorado 80631, (970) <br />381 -0828) <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />KGR /JMH /Approval_2012 Parker Dersham_Baseline.docx <br />