My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-19_PERMIT FILE - M2011039 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2011039
>
2012-01-19_PERMIT FILE - M2011039 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:41 PM
Creation date
1/23/2012 7:57:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2011039
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/19/2012
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Colorado Moss Rock, Inc.
Email Name
TC1
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr Kim Barickman <br />Page 2 <br />January 19, 2012 <br />Reclamation Board: <br />6.3.1 EXHIBIT A — Legal Description and Location Map <br />2. There is a discrepancy in the north -south length of the west boundary line of the <br />8.9 -acre mining area. The text in both Exhibit A's: "Legal Description and <br />Location Map" and "SITE PLAN and LOCATION MAP "; on EXHIBIT E — <br />MINING PLAN; and on EXHIBIT RECLAMATION PLAN MAP all state the <br />length is 270 feet. However, on the map portion of the three aforementioned <br />figures, the west boundary line is drawn to be the same length as the east boundary <br />line, and labeled as 320 feet on EXHIBIT E — MINING PLAN; and on EXHIBIT <br />RECLAMATION PLAN MAP. Please provide clarification as to which is correct. <br />If the west boundary line is in fact 270 feet, it will require a change in the affected <br />area on the application and the Exhibit "E" figures, as well as an adjustment to the <br />bearing(s) of the south and/or north boundary lines of the larger "rectangular" area. <br />3. The UTM coordinates for the entry gate at the bottom of Exhibit A do not match <br />those provided in the Application: <br />a. Application UTM coordinates: 503695 E, 4196959 N <br />b. Exhibit "A" UTM coordinates: 503689 E, 4197064 N <br />Please provide a consistent set of entrance gate coordinates on the Application and <br />Exhibits. <br />6.3.2 EXHIBIT A — 6.3.4 EXHIBIT D <br />These sections are adequate as submitted. <br />6.3.5 EXHIBIT E — Map <br />4. As noted in Comment 2 above, the metes and bounds in the text of these two <br />Exhibits do not match the west boundary length as drawn (270 feet vs. 320 feet). <br />Please provide corrected Exhibits E. <br />5. There is a fence and entry structure indentified in Exhibit L. These structures are <br />not located/identified on either of Exhibits E. Please identify them on the <br />EXHIBIT E — MINING PLAN, and on EXHIBIT RECLAMATION PLAN MAP if <br />they are to remain after reclamation. <br />6.3.6 EXHIBIT F — 6.3.11 EXHIBIT K <br />These sections are adequate as submitted. <br />6.3.12 EXHIBIT L — Permanent Man -Made Structures <br />6. The Division assumes the three structures listed: "ranch fence ", "ranch roads ", and <br />"entry structure" are all three owned by the applicant, Mr. Barickman. Please <br />confirm Mr. Barickman owns all three listed structures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.