My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-13_REVISION - M1992058 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1992058
>
2012-01-13_REVISION - M1992058 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:26 PM
Creation date
1/20/2012 11:35:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992058
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/13/2012
Doc Name
Conversion Application
From
Colorado Quarries, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Source of Reclamation Material— Fremont County Area, Colorado <br />Description <br />Reclamation material is used in areas that have been drastically disturbed by <br />surface mining or similar activities. When these areas are reclaimed, layers of soil <br />material or unconsolidated geological material, or both, are replaced in a vertical <br />sequence. The reconstructed soil favors plant growth. The ratings do not apply to <br />quarries or other mined areas that require an offsite source of reconstruction <br />material. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect erosion and stability <br />of the surface and the productive potential of the reclaimed soil. These properties <br />include the content of sodium, salts, and calcium carbonate; reaction; available <br />water capacity; erodibility; texture; content of rock fragments; and content of organic <br />matter and other features that affect fertility. <br />The soils are rated "good," "fair," or "poor" as potential sources of reclamation <br />material. The ratings are based on the amount of suitable material and on soil <br />properties that affect the ease of excavation and the performance of the material <br />after it is in place. The thickness of the suitable material is a major consideration. <br />The ease of excavation is affected by large stones, depth to a water table, and <br />slope. How well the soil performs in place after it has been compacted and drained <br />is determined by its strength (as inferred from the AASHTO classification of the soil) <br />and linear extensibility (shrink -swell potential). Normal compaction, minor <br />processing, and other standard construction practices are assumed. <br />When the material is properly used in reclamation, a rating of "good" means that <br />establishing and maintaining vegetation are relatively easy, that the surface is <br />stable and resists erosion, and that the reclaimed soil has good potential <br />productivity. A rating of "fair" means that vegetation can be established and <br />maintained and the soil can be stabilized through modification of one or more <br />properties. For satisfactory performance, it may be necessary to topdress with <br />better suited material or add soil amendments. A rating of "poor" means that <br />revegetation and stabilization are very difficult and costly. To establish and maintain <br />vegetation, it is necessary to topdress with better suited material. <br />Numerical ratings between 0.00 and 0.99 are given after the specified features. <br />These numbers indicate the degree to which the features limit the soils as sources <br />of reclamation material. The lower the number, the greater the limitation. <br />The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary <br />by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer <br />are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is <br />shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those <br />that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition <br />of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better <br />understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. <br />Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The <br />ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be <br />viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil <br />Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to <br />validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. <br />Stockpile Site <br />U SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/13/2011 <br />iiiiiiim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.