Laserfiche WebLink
C. Suspended Solids Demonstration <br />SCC submitted pond discharge sample data for all of the ponds receiving discharge from <br />the proposed release area, as well as receiving stream sample data from monitoring points <br />upstream and downstream of the pond outfalls. The pond outfall data indicate that total <br />suspended solids (TSS) contributions do not exceed the limits set forth by the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and Environment. Monitoring data of the upstream and <br />downstream receiving stream sites indicate that TSS is reduced from the upstream site at the <br />downstream site. <br />The sediment ponds receiving runoff from the proposed release area (Ponds 010, 011, 012, <br />013, and 014) have all been proposed as permanent ponds; the operator demonstrated that <br />the quantity and quality of impounded water were appropriate for their intended use. Final <br />approval is dependent on approval from the Colorado Department of Water Resources <br />where water rights are concerned. <br />In addition to the pond effluent sample data submitted by SCC, the Division requested <br />annual sediment level data from Seneca Coal Company (Table 2) for the ponds receiving <br />runoff from the proposed release area. The data show that sediment levels in the ponds <br />have stabilized since revegetation activities began in 2006. None of the ponds have <br />required cleaning since Pond 010 was dredged in 2002 and Pond 011 in 2003. <br />Table 2 - Sediment Data Provided by Seneca Coal Company <br />Sediment Trends <br />(ac -ft gained/lost by year) <br />Pond ID <br />2005 <br />2006 <br />2007 <br />2008 <br />2009 <br />2010 <br />2011 <br />watershed area <br />010 <br />0.0 <br />3.1 <br />0.2 <br />-2.3 <br />0.0 <br />-0.2 <br />-0.2 <br />940.4 ac <br />011 <br />0.0 <br />0.2 <br />0.7 <br />-0.7 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />0.0 <br />141.3 ac <br />012 <br />0.0 <br />-0.3 <br />1.9* <br />3.2* <br />0.0 <br />-0.4 <br />0.2 <br />36.8 ac (336.6) <br />013 <br />0.0 <br />-0.2 <br />0.7 <br />-0.4 <br />0.1 <br />-0.1 <br />0.1 <br />34 ac <br />014 <br />0.0 <br />-0.8 <br />1.3 <br />0.1 <br />3.0 <br />-0.1 <br />0.1 <br />154.3 ac <br />from the adjacent Pond 012 landslide <br />The Division also independently completed a Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation <br />(RUSLE) calculation comparing the reclaimed areas to the adjacent unmined areas. The <br />Division's calculation was based on data in the permit application package for climate, soil <br />types and control /practice factors; slope measurements from the existing topography maps <br />submitted annually by SCC; and vegetation monitoring data from the SL -3 application for <br />the Phase H bond release and Extended Reference areas. Several slopes in the reclamation <br />area were individually modeled and then averaged and compared to a weighted average of <br />the extended reference areas. The calculations, presented in Table 3, indicate that sediment <br />delivery from the mined areas is approximately equal to that of the adjacent unmined areas. <br />Yoast Mine C- 1994 -082 Page 8 of 17 Phase II Bond Release SL -3 <br />