My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-12_REVISION - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2012-01-12_REVISION - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:25 PM
Creation date
1/17/2012 10:06:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/12/2012
Doc Name
Landowner Recommendation for Additional Reference Area Sampling (Emailed)
From
Linda Saunders
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR39
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Binns, Janet C� <br />From: Linda Saunders [saunders615 @live.com] C M $ +G ( c( <br />Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:29 AM 2 3O <br />To: Binns, Janet <br />Subject: RE: Hearing shedule for the DofRMS is holding meetings on Jan 11 -12th on issues to be <br />addressed in the future by them ��, ,� `Qn � � . <br />C- <br />03-144-'m ' `—{r" Ci s ( Ccorn✓ , ' t- t. <br />Hi Janet, r SG„"` i <br />I would like to recommend that the Division review and require the reference area be evaluated early in tW reveg <br />process not in Year 9, but haven't been able to get any information on the hearings or submittting comment. <br />Please pass this on. Emails to Dan re returned also. <br />Thanks <br />Linda <br />Subject: RE: Hearing shedule <br />Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:21:28 -0700 <br />From: Janet.Binns @state.co.us <br />To: saunders615 @live.com <br />Hello Linda, <br />The Division has not yet made a proposed decision on TR39. We wanted to wait until we held the meeting with the Vento <br />group. I will research the additional questions that were brought up at the meeting or on Friday 1/6 that I had inadequate <br />time to research. I have been in the field since Tuesday morning, so I have not been able to follow up on this. I will not be <br />back in the office until tomorrow. <br />I am extremely confused about your question regarding the January board hearing. The Division has not made a <br />proposed decision on TR39. Once we make a proposed decision, then you may request a board hearing if you disagree <br />with the Division's proposed decision. If you request a hearing, in writing, not via e-mail, then DRMS would schedule this <br />for the next board meeting. <br />Our rules and regulations are all available on the website, that provide detail of how you may request an item to be heard <br />by the board. <br />I would have to research how many revisions have been requested for changes to reference areas in the last 20 years. <br />We had 64 permitted coal mines in the state at one time, so there is quite a large data base. I know of one off the top of <br />my head due to the landowner mowing all the oak brush in the reference area in year 10 of the operator's period of <br />liability. <br />Please explain the hardship the current rules incur due to reclamation area needing to have a minimum 10 year liability <br />period? The 10 year liability period has been in place since our Rules were promulgated in 1981 and follow the liability <br />period required by SMRCA. <br />Janet Binns <br />From: Linda Saunders fmailto:saunders615 @live.com] <br />Sent: Wed 1/11/2012 3:51 PM <br />To: Binns, Janet <br />Subject: Hearing shedule <br />Hi Janet, <br />Thank you for researching and having the information ready for our meeting. I was really impressed and appreciative. <br />When will you make a decision and how will we find out. <br />Also, I tried the phone number for Irene and only got a voice message. I did leave a message. <br />What day and time will revegetation be discussed during the hearings on Jan 11 -12. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.