My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-06_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2012-01-06_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:12 PM
Creation date
1/9/2012 12:27:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/6/2012
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings (PR6)
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR6
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
detailed and comprehensive, several issues of concern were raised during the adequacy <br />review. <br />The Division questioned what field characteristics would be used to define appropriate <br />salvage depths and requested justification for complete or partial salvage variances <br />proposed for a number of soil map units. SCC provided appropriate detail in regard to <br />field salvage depth determinations. Generally, in shale derived soils dominated by <br />western wheatgrass /alkali sagebrush vegetation, a 6 inch depth was salvaged. In <br />sandstone derived soils dominated by mixed brush vegetation, salvage was terminated at <br />the sandstone bedrock contact or when a characteristic reddish brown clay subsoil was <br />encountered. <br />In response to the salvage variance concerns, various tables, exhibits and text sections <br />were revised to indicate that all suitable topsoil would be salvaged and that no salvage <br />variances were being requested. The proposed soil replacement depth was changed from <br />1.1 feet to 1.3 feet. Based on disturbed area modifications, updated soil balance <br />calculations, and reclamation plan changes made in association with PR -5, the approved <br />average replacement thickness in the original permit area is 1.3 feet, and average <br />replacement thickness in the South Extension area is 1.1 feet. Within designated aspen <br />planting exclosures, approved average replacement soil thickness is 4.0 feet; within <br />upland shrub establishment areas topsoiled in 2006, average replacement thickness is 0.6 <br />feet. <br />Certain statements in Tab 21 indicate that topsoil in map units 101, 103 and S 103 may be <br />of questionable suitability based on rock fragment content. Current information indicates <br />that topsoil in the subject map units is suitable and was salvaged. <br />Soil stabilization methods proposed by the operator consist primarily of minimal seed bed <br />preparation (resulting in a roughened soils surface) and use of either straw mulch or a <br />quick growing annual grain cover crop on all topsoiled areas. Reclaimed areas will be <br />inspected annually by the operator as required by the proposed rill and gully maintenance <br />plan, and additional stabilization measures will be implemented if results of the annual <br />evaluation warrant such modifications. Graded spoils with excessive clay content as <br />detected by monitoring described in Section III.E, above, were deep ripped to relieve <br />compaction, pursuant to 4.06.4(1). <br />A topsoil amendment program will be initiated if visual observation or annual vegetation <br />monitoring indicates symptoms of nutrient deficiency within reclaimed vegetation stands. <br />Generally, native species are adapted to the fertility levels of the replaced topsoils, and <br />fertilization has not been shown to be of significant long term benefit in the region. <br />SCC may prepare a roughened seedbed on slopes steeper than 25 % to be employed in <br />conjunction with broadcast seeding. The roughened seedbed entailed extensive gouging <br />Seneca II -W Findings Document 43 C- 1982 -057 <br />Permit Revision No. 6 January 6, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.