Laserfiche WebLink
4. The Division finds that the permit area is, subject to valid rights existing as of August 3, <br />1977, not within: <br />a) An area designated unsuitable for surface coal mining operations (2.07.6(2)(d)(i)); <br />b) An area under study for designation as unsuitable for surface coal mining <br />operations (2.07.6(2)(d)(ii)); <br />C) The boundaries of the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, <br />the National System of Trails, the National Wilderness Preservation System, the <br />Wild and Scenic Rivers System including rivers under study for designation, and <br />National Recreation Areas (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(A)); <br />d) Three hundred feet of any public building, school, church, community or <br />institutional building, or public park (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(13)); <br />e) One hundred feet of a cemetery (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(Q); <br />f) The boundaries of any National Forest unless the required finding of compatibility <br />has been made by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. <br />(2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(D)); <br />g) One hundred feet of the outside right -of -way line of any public road except where <br />mine access or haul roads join such line, and excepting any roads for which the <br />necessary approvals have been received, notices published, public hearing <br />opportunities provided, and written findings made (2.07.6(2)(d)(iv)); <br />h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver from the owner <br />has been provided (2.07.6(2)(d)(v)). <br />5. On the basis of correspondence from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the <br />Division finds that subject to valid existing rights as of August 3, 1977, the mining <br />operation will not adversely affect any publicly owned park or place listed on or eligible <br />for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as determined by the State Historic <br />Preservation Office (2.07.6(2)(e)(i)). In a letter of November 30, 1999 associated with <br />review of Permit Revision No. 2, the SHPO noted that the entire proposed permit <br />boundary had previously been surveyed for cultural resources, and that only two rock art <br />sites had been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. <br />Subsequent correspondence documented that adequate protections and documentation had <br />been completed with respect to the eligible sites (both located within or adjacent to the <br />"original" mine permit boundary). In a letter of July 17, 2000 associated with Permit <br />Renewal No. 3 (RN -3), the SHPO noted that, since the renewal "will involve no changes <br />to the permitted mining boundaries, we find that there will be no effect to cultural <br />Seneca II -W Findings Document 15 C- 1982 -057 <br />Permit Revision No. 6 January 6, 2012 <br />