Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 2 <br />FWS conservation measure of a pond lining do not appear to be relevant to Rule <br />4.18(5)(c). Please revise the text accordingly. <br />3. The first sentence in Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(ii) on revised page 2.05 -56 states that <br />alternative sediment control will be used to treat surface runoff from the facilities area. <br />However, the Division's Rules considers sediment ponds to be a primary sediment <br />control measure. Please revise the sentence accordingly. <br />4. The last sentence in the first paragraph of Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv) on revised page 2.05- <br />61 states that the coal operation does not have the potential to negatively impact the <br />ground water quality. However, it has already been determined that the potential does <br />exist. Therefore, please omit this sentence from the permit application text. <br />5. Revised Map 13 is titled "Drainage Plan — Ponds 1 -4 ". Please revise the map title to read <br />"Drainage Plan — Ponds 1 -3 ". <br />6. On the first page of the Biological Assessment Addendum #2, a statement is made that <br />CAM used 2.2 inches as the 100 year -24 hour precipitation event. Actually, CAM used <br />2.6 inches. <br />c: /word2007 /fruita/newappmemo6 <br />