My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-30_REPORT - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2011-12-30_REPORT - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:46:36 PM
Creation date
1/4/2012 7:00:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
12/30/2011
Doc Name
Annual Report
From
Mark A. Heifner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Fee/Report
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the result was a good growth period in the summer until August and September. The weather <br />changed again to dry and very hot for the late summer period. Record and near record heat and <br />dryness occurred throughout much of eastern Colorado. This was in spite of a neutral ENSO climate <br />pattern. <br />This dry and hot pattern finally changed in November and December with good snowfall <br />although the average temperatures generally remained above normal. By the end of the year, a <br />second weak to moderate La Nina pattern redeveloped in the equatorial Pacific, but its effects were <br />not seen in the weather patterns until the very end of December. Long range forecasts seem to be <br />trending toward a drier and warmer winter for early 2012 with a return to a general northwest flow as <br />occurred in late 2010 and early 2011. The La Nina may decline by summer 2012. <br />Weed Control Issues: Leafy spurge remains the dominant noxious weed throughout the site, but <br />the strong grass growth in recent years certainly has restricted its expansion and dominance. It can <br />still be found in essentially every habitat on the site except reclaimed mined land, upland sand near <br />mining sites, and in the wetlands along the stream. Its abundance though appears to continue to show <br />a slow decline in most habitats. Localized control measures has also helped limit its expansion. <br />As was noted in previous reports, with the increased growth of grasses due to the removal of <br />grazing the spurge continued to decline in density throughout the area. It is still a fairly robust and <br />tenacious growth, but with better management the spurge is not as strong as it was previously and the <br />dominance gain among the grasses seems to continue the decline in spurge. Continued control <br />measures are having the desired effect of further reducing the spurge, but there is still a great deal to <br />be done to bring the spurge population down to a reasonable level. Although no quantitative data <br />were collected, visual inspection showed that in 2011 spurge continued its decline as natives gained <br />more ground in the middle part of the season. The prodigious moisture of mid spring normally would <br />favor spurge expansion, but if that occurred it was so slight it was not noticeable. Grass density and <br />condition is so good now that spurge is confined and expansion difficult due to competition. Once <br />again it is found that excellent management and maintenance of dense growth of native species can <br />greatly limit weed expansion, even with species as competitive as leafy spurge. Drowning the land in <br />herbicide really is not necessary if the land is properly managed and protected from, most especially, <br />overgrazing. Herbicide use can then be limited to only those areas where disturbance maintains the <br />weed growth or there was a near total dominance by spurge to begin with. <br />The remaining small Tamarix population treated in previous years has apparently been <br />eliminated. Only one additional plant was found in 2011. Is the invasion over? Perhaps, but <br />inspection and monitoring of the area needs to be continued for a few more years to be sure no more <br />appear from long seed dormancy or changing growth conditions. In favor of at least a very limited <br />return of this demonic species is the development of the vegetation in the area of the infestation. <br />When the infestation was first discovered, native growth was extremely limited and in poor <br />2011 Annual Report Coal Creek Wetland Mitigation Permit DA 198811488 Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.