My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-21_REVISION - C1991078
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1991078
>
2011-12-21_REVISION - C1991078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:46:24 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 10:54:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/21/2011
Doc Name
Bond Release Application
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vegetation trampled by investigators during sample site location (Figure 1). It was deemed most prudent <br />to utilize this quadrat orientation and size to capture more variation "within the sample unit" and thereby <br />reduce "between sample" variation and hence sample size. To facilitate collection of production from a <br />full 1m quadrat, the first 1 /2 m frame was flipped end - over -end along the long axis following harvest of <br />the first frame. This process resulted in a sampling unit of 0.5 meters X 2.0 meters. From within each <br />quadrat, all above ground current annual vegetation within the vertical boundaries of the frame were <br />clipped and bagged separately by life form as follows: <br />Perennial Grass Perennial Forb <br />Annual Grass Annual Forb <br />Sub - shrubs <br />Noxious Weeds (if found) <br />All production samples were returned to the lab for drying and weighing. Drying was conducted at 105 ° C <br />until a stable weight was achieved (24 hours). Samples were then re- weighed to the nearest 0.1 gram. <br />2.5 Sample Adeauacv Determination <br />Sampling within each managerial unit was conducted to a minimum of 24 or 25 (cover and woody <br />plant density) and 48 or 50 (production) samples per unit. Sampling within each reference area was <br />conducted to a minimum of 15 (cover) and 45 (production) samples per area. From these preliminary <br />efforts, sample means and standard deviations for total non - overlapping vegetation ground cover, <br />production, and woody plant density (informational only) were calculated. For bond - release applications, <br />the typical procedure is that sampling must continue until an adequate sample, n has been collected <br />in accordance with the Cochran formula (below) for determining sample adequacy, whereby the <br />population is estimated to within 10% of the true mean (p) with 90% confidence. Otherwise, reverse - <br />null evaluations must occur. <br />follows: <br />When the inequality (n <_ n) is true, sampling is deemed adequate; and n is determined as <br />where: n = the number of actual samples collected (initial size = 15, 25, etc.) <br />t = the value from the one - tailed t distribution for 90% confidence with n -1 <br />degrees of freedom; <br />s 2 = the variance of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples; <br />7 = the mean of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. <br />nmin = (t / (0.1 .4' ) <br />Page 8 Hamilton Mine - 2011 <br />Phase III Bond Release Evaluation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.