My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-16_REVISION - M1977572 (71)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977572
>
2011-12-16_REVISION - M1977572 (71)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:05:25 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 12:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977572
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/16/2011
Doc Name
Submittal
From
VALCO
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Existing 100 -year water surface elevations downstream of Highway 50 range from 0.4 to 5.7 feet <br />higher than the corrected effective water surface elevations. The increase in 100 -year water surface <br />elevations can be attributed to the elevation of Berms B, C, D, and E, which limit the conveyance <br />capacity of the right overbank. Adverse impacts to the floodplain in the existing condition are also a <br />result of Berm F (in the southeast corner of the site) which impedes flow from spreading south as was <br />the case in the corrected effective condition. <br />A comparison of 1977 and 2005 aerial photography is provided in Figure 3.3. Figure 3.4 shows a <br />graphical profile of the existing channel, the overbank ground based upon 1980 and 2008/2009 <br />topography, and the corrected effective and existing condition 100 -year water surface elevations. <br />Comparison of the aerial photography and available topography shows that the configuration of Berm A <br />and Berm A -B has been changed since 1980. The graphical profile of the overbank shows that the <br />elevation of Berm A is approximately 12 feet higher than the 1980 ground. Similarly, comparisons of <br />Berms B, C, D, and E indicate increases in berm heights ranging from 2 to 9 feet. A graphical profile <br />comparison of Berm F from the 1980 and 2008/2009 topography along with corrected effective and <br />existing condition water surface elevations is provided in Figure 3.5. The existing Berm F profile shows a <br />berm height increase ranging from 6 to 12 feet when compared to the 1980 topography. <br />Mapping of the floodplain was not included in the scope of work for the current study. It should <br />be noted that the Valco property boundary is approximately 1,300 -feet in width (from north to south) <br />and located in the middle of the approximately 5,000 -foot wide 100 -year floodplain. <br />COVALCOO1_Phase 11 Report_082211.docx <br />3.6 ANdERSON CONSUITINq ENGINEERS, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.