My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-20_INSPECTION - M1983089
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1983089
>
2011-12-20_INSPECTION - M1983089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:46:21 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 12:31:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983089
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
12/20/2011
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
Douglas County Sand & Gravel, LLC
Inspection Date
11/18/2011
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OBSERVATIONS <br />PERMIT #: M- 1983 -089 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: BMK <br />INSPECTION DATE: November 18, 2011 <br />1) The Division conducted a monitoring inspection of the site on 11/18/11. The site was active at the time <br />of the inspection. Present during the inspection was Mr. John Miner the operator. <br />2) The site is a 112 phased sand and gravel operation located approximately 3 miles south east of Castle <br />Rock. The total permitted acres is 66.50 of which, the operator can only affect 17 acres at any given <br />time. The operator must be aware that the total affected acres include any area being utilized as part <br />of the operation and not limited to mining areas. These areas include but not limited to equipment <br />storage areas and other ancillary disturbances. The operator must submit a better map of the total <br />permitted and affect areas at present and use this map to report the affected acres in the annual <br />report. <br />3) The current active mining pit is located along the North West side of the permit area. Pit slopes <br />appeared stable. There was a small puddle of water that was exposed at the bottom of the pit. The <br />source of this water did not appear to be shallow ground water; however it could be from the adjacent <br />perennial stream, because the depth of the mining elevation is below the invert of the channel or from <br />the larger watershed up gradient of the permit area. Since the true hydraulic conductivity for the pit is <br />not clearly defined, it is difficult to determine the actual source of the exposed water. The operator <br />agreed to backfill all exposed ground water once mining is completed. He also stated that there is a <br />waters substitute supply plan in place. However the substitute water supply plan from the State <br />engineer is not part of the permit application .If there is an approved water substitute supply plan; the <br />operator is encouraged to submit the plan from the State Engineers Office for our records. <br />4) The Division is currently holding a financial warranty in the amount of $98,189.00 to cover the cost of <br />reclamation. Once the operator provides an accurate map of the permit and affected areas, the <br />warranty for the site will be re- calculated. The operator is also encouraged to remove all the old <br />mining equipments that area for sale scattered throughout the permit area and place them outside of <br />the permit area or in a designated location of the permit where the Division can calculate the required <br />warranty for the affected area by these old mining equipments. This area can be designated as a bone <br />yard area requiring only seeding and could be designated as minor disturbance area. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.