My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981044 (16)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
_INSPECTION - C1981044 (16)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2020 5:44:02 AM
Creation date
12/19/2011 1:04:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Inspection Date
11/29/2011
Email Name
ZTT
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 29,2011 C-1981-044/Williams Fork Mines ZTT <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 <br /> ❑Drainage Control 4.05.1,4.05.2,4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5,4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, <br /> 4.05.10;Diversions 4.05.4;Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring <br /> 4.05.13;Drainage—Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8;Impoundments 4.05.6,4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18 <br /> Mine No. 5 dewatering pump was operating at the time of inspection.Water was being pumped into pond 5-P6 <br /> and flowing into ponds 5-P5 and 5-P7. It appears that additional water was trying to be pumped into pond 5-P7. <br /> The pipe discharging the additional water seemed to be clogged or disconnected above pond 5-P6,causing water <br /> to discharge into pond 5-P6.None of the additional water being pumped was discharged into pond 5-P7.The final <br /> discharge from pond 5-P7 into the Williams Fork River was clear. Ponds 5-P5,5-P6 and 5-1`7 were well vegetated <br /> and stable.Burrows in the embankments have been repaired but continued inspections of pond embankments are <br /> needed due to the presence of a muskrat at the time of inspection. <br /> Pond 5A-P1 was dry.Pond embankments were well vegetated with no erosion or structural issues. <br /> i r III _ <br /> f <br /> Additional discharge into Pond 5-P6. Repaired burrow. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.