My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-07_HYDROLOGY - M1981058
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1981058
>
2011-12-07_HYDROLOGY - M1981058
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:45:53 PM
Creation date
12/8/2011 7:09:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981058
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
12/7/2011
Doc Name
SWSP
From
OSE
To
Deere & Ault Consultants, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Depth to Ground <br />Water (Feet) <br />Percent Reduction in CU Credit' <br />Native Grass <br />Alfalfa <br />1 <br />85% <br />100% <br />2 <br />50% <br />90% <br />3 <br />30% <br />75% <br />4 <br />20% <br />50% <br />5 <br />15% <br />35% <br />6 <br />10% <br />20% <br />7 <br />5% <br />15% <br />8 <br />0% <br />10% <br />Mr. Mark A. McLean, P.E. <br />DeBeque Pit SWSP <br />(a) For fields deep tilled or chemically treated to successfully kill alfalfa or native grass, <br />100% credit will be given for consumptive use as otherwise computed under the <br />conditions of this approval. <br />(b) For fields not deep tilled or chemically treated to successfully kill alfalfa, records of <br />monthly monitoring of depth to groundwater at existing irrigation wells or existing or new <br />monitoring wells or piezometers within % -mile of each alfalfa or native grass field must <br />be maintained. Credits will be reduced according to the following table when depth to <br />groundwater is less than the depth assumed to provide no significant contribution to <br />alfalfa growth. Measurements taken at the start of each month will determine the <br />necessary reduction in credit to be applied during the following month. The Applicant <br />may use another methodology upon review and approval by the state engineer and <br />division engineer. <br />1. Adapted from EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND AGRONOMIC RESPONSES IN FORMERLY IRRIGATED MOUNTAIN <br />MEADOWS, South Park, Colorado, March 1, 1990; Revised September 1, 1991 <br />17. The dry year analysis required by this office for a permanent plan for augmentation may vary from <br />the analysis approved in this SWSP. Approval of this SWSP shall have no precedential or <br />evidentiary force, does not constitute an admission or statement of position in any other <br />proceeding, and shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law <br />contained herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />18. This SWSP may be revoked or modified at any time should it be determined that injury to other <br />vested water rights has occurred or will occur as a result of the operation of this SWSP. Should <br />this SWSP expire without renewal or be revoked prior to adjudication of a permanent plan for <br />augmentation, all excavation of product from below the water table and all other use of water at <br />the pit must cease immediately. <br />19. In accordance with amendments to CRS 25 -8- 202(7) and Senate Bill 89 -181 Rules and <br />Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine if the substitute <br />supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to which the senior appropriation receiving the <br />substituted supply has normally been put. As such, water quality data or analyses may be <br />requested at any time to determine if the requirements of use of the senior appropriator are met. <br />20. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall not create <br />any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any water court case or any <br />other legal action that may be initiated concerning the SWSP. This decision shall not bind the <br />state engineer to act in a similar manner in any other applications involving other SWSPs or in any <br />proposed renewal of this SWSP, and shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or <br />conclusions of law contained herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />December 5, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.