My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-01_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2011-12-01_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:45:31 PM
Creation date
12/2/2011 8:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
12/1/2011
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review No. 2
From
Western Fuels Association
To
DRMS
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response — In a telephone conference call between Murari Shrestha and DRMS on 1 <br />November and again on 3 November 2011, the DRMS agreed this there was no need <br />to quantify soil materials by ownership parcel. <br />c) Please also tabulate the soil types, acreages, and volumes by landowner. <br />Response — In a telephone conference call between Murari Shrestha and DRMS on 1 <br />November and again on 3 November 2011, the DRMS agreed this there was no need <br />to quantify soil materials by ownership parcel. <br />d) For each polygon, please include the average thickness, in inches, in the table. <br />Response — The average thickness of soil materials suitable for salvage are found in <br />the revised table on Map 2.04.9 -3, Topsoil Salvage Map. In addition, the average <br />thickness for each specific soil polygon has been added to this Map. <br />15. The permit application is thorough in its identification of available topsoil resources, but <br />details regarding handling, storage and replacement of topsoil (and subsoil) are lacking. <br />Map 2.04.9 -3 is a very clear and detailed description of the soil type, location and volume <br />with corresponding polygons. It is not clear from this map or the text description how the <br />topsoil (type and depth) to be salvaged with each panel of the mine will be clearly delineated <br />in the field for the equipment operators who conduct stripping. <br />Response: With the average thickness of suitable soil materials available for salvage <br />as found in revised Map 2.04.9 -3, Topsoil Salvage Map and the training procedures <br />described on PAP 11 of Section 2.05.4(2)(d), the mine foremen and equipment <br />operators will have sufficient information on how much soil material is to be <br />salvaged from each specific mine disturbance area. <br />a) Please describe in detail the technique that will be implemented to salvage the topsoil. <br />Include in the description salvage depths for each panel /soil map unit; volumes of <br />salvaged topsoil; parameters that determine the salvage depth; which soil types will be <br />stored/mixed together and which will be salvaged / stockpiled or replaced separately. <br />Response — The average soil salvage depths for each soil mapping unit polygon are <br />found in the table and accompanying map revisions found on revised Map 2.04.9 -3, <br />Topsoil Salvage Map. In a telephone conference call between Murari Shrestha on 1 <br />November and again on 3 November 2011, the DRMS agreed this there is no need to <br />quantify soil materials by mine panel. The volumes of salvaged topsoil for each <br />specific soil mapping unit are found in the table and accompanying map revisions <br />found on revised Map 2.04.9 -3, Topsoil Salvage Map. A discussion of the parameters <br />which determine salvage depth are found in the discussion of Topsoil Suitability <br />found on PAP pages 28 and 29 of Section 2.04.9. As described there, the single most <br />limiting factor in soil suitability is the rock fragment content. <br />b) The WyDEQ guideline, in Appendices II and III, contains excellent examples of topsoil <br />and overburden balance calculations. Please review these examples and provide <br />exhibits of comparable detail for inclusion in the application. <br />Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.