Laserfiche WebLink
6.4.7 Exhibit "G" Water Information <br />1) It is the understanding of the Division, that the proposed operation does not anticipate <br />intercepting ground water during the mining operation. Were there any test holes <br />conducted to verify these findings based on the depth of mining? Please explain. <br />couple feet'of ov'e'rb.urden prior to final top soil application. The side slo`pes'will also <br />not ";be graded smooth, but Will' contain a low profile ridging pattern that follows the <br />contour Did'; the ,total material calculation under backfiliing of slopes to 3H:1V in <br />Exhibit "L " ;used these assumptions? Please explain. <br />It is the understanding of the Division; the operator will salvage all available top <br />soil /growth medium, and commits to placing an average of 4 inches of the top soil over <br />th,eaffected area Please confirm. <br />Under water;general information the operator states, "Although rolling topography is <br />described ,above,.discharge from the pit floor to the Rock Creek Valley will still occur <br />Please refer to comments 'regarding affected drainage leaving the site under Exhibits D <br />&E <br />6.4.12 Exhibit "L ". Reclamation Cost <br />1) Under Exhibit "L" the operator provided a detailed cost estimate using aspects A, B, C <br />& D. The operator plans to have a 3H:1V final slope for the pit high walls: However, <br />there is significant change in the total back fill volumes from what was submitted in <br />the original amendment application for the reclaimed pit high slopes. Please explain <br />the changes in volume. <br />6.4.19 Exhibit "S " `Permanent Man - made Structures <br />1) Under the Exhibit the operator listed; 1) Charter Oak Ranch Road, 2) Fence and related <br />structures and '3) Unimproved road as the only manmade structures within 200 feet of <br />the proposed amended area. Please provide proof in accordance with Rule 6.4.19 (a) <br />or (b) if such an agreement as outlined under (a) cannot be reached. <br />