My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-28_PERMIT FILE - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-10-28_PERMIT FILE - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:44:25 PM
Creation date
11/30/2011 8:49:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/28/2011
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE CONTROL, MONITORING, AND MITIGATION PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 24 Subsidence Control, Monitoring, and Mitigation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 11, 2011 Page 27 <br />4.12.3 Worst Possible Consequences of Damage to Brick/Masonry Low -Rise Structures <br />Subsidence - induced damages to brick/masonry walled low -rise structures may be <br />classified into three categories architectural, functional, and structural —depending on the <br />levels of ground disturbance. Architectural damage may mean small cracks in the plaster and <br />sticking of doors and windows. Functional damage could bring about instability of some <br />structural elements, e.g., jammed doors and/or windows, broken window panes, and restricted <br />building services. Structural damage may render the structure unsafe for habitation, and possibly <br />lead to collapse, requiring complete rebuilding or restoration. <br />4.12.4 Brick/Masonry Low -Rise Structure Damage Mitigation Plan <br />In case monitoring indicates the onset of damage or potential for damage to <br />brick/masonry low -rise structures, the following mitigation plan should be adopted: <br />Appropriate personnel at mine and regulatory authorities, as well as the owners of the <br />building, should be informed in case anomalies are observed that may indicate an <br />affected building. <br />Remedial techniques such as trenching, shoring, and structural reinforcement should be <br />applied to restrict further damage to the structures. <br />• The room - and - pillar development plan should be re- evaluated to ensure that operations <br />will not further damage the structure in question. <br />4.13 Timber Frame Buildings <br />4.13.1 Timber Frame Building Subsidence Control Plan <br />Several structures on either side of SH 12 such as frame houses, sheds and/or pens, <br />greenhouses, garages, barns and log frame cabins were classified as timber frame buildings. <br />Room - and - pillar entries and panels may be developed underneath timber frame structures with <br />no pillar extraction within the buffer zone estimated using the Pennsylvania Subsidence Act <br />guideline. <br />The pillar sizes for development mining within the buffer zone are to be determined using <br />appropriate methods such as ARMPS so that they have SFs of at least 1.5. In case the workings <br />directly beneath the timber frame buildings are to be utilized for water storage, the stability of <br />the developed pillars is to be evaluated on a site - specific basis. <br />4.13.2 Timber Frame Building Monitoring Plan <br />plan: <br />To ensure that the control plan is effective, AAI recommends the following monitoring <br />Accurate location and elevation information for the buildings must be collected prior to <br />mining. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.