My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-28_PERMIT FILE - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-10-28_PERMIT FILE - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:44:25 PM
Creation date
11/30/2011 8:49:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/28/2011
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE CONTROL, MONITORING, AND MITIGATION PLAN
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 24 Subsidence Control, Monitoring, and Mitigation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 11, 2011 Page 3 <br />A comprehensive study of subsidence related to longwall mining in the Allen Mine was <br />initiated in 1981. The final report for this study is dated September 19, 1982. This study <br />obtained subsidence data (vertical and horizontal) over longwall and room - and - pillar mining <br />areas. According to New Elk Coal Company, LLC, the data obtained during this study indicated <br />that subsidence in this area typically occurs as vertical displacement of the total overburden unit <br />(i.e., very little differential settlement) with dampened horizontal status. Partial subsidence data <br />indicate maximum vertical displacement of about 3 ft over a 6 -ft -high longwall panel and <br />maximum horizontal displacement of less than 1 ft. This displacement occurred within 6 months <br />of longwall undermining. Subsidence under room - and - pillar areas was considerably less <br />(maximum vertical 0.3 and 1.4 ft), with most displacement occurring within 3 months. Based on <br />the data obtained, it can be inferred that subsidence over the New Elk Mine occurs quickly and in <br />mass, with very little visible surface expression. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that any <br />subsidence that may have resulted from undermining (more than 20 years ago) has already <br />occurred and that additional subsidence resulting from placement of the refuse pile would be <br />minimal. The stability of the refuse pile as designed (SF 1.5) should not be affected by <br />subsidence. <br />The post- mining and pre - mining land uses of the permit area are identical and are <br />described in detail in Section 2.04.3 of the current permit. The land use is shown on Map 4, Pre - <br />Mine Land Use; Map 15, Surface Disturbance and Post - Mining Land Use —East Portal; and <br />Map 16, Surface Disturbance and Post - Mining Land Use —West Portal. New Elk does plan to <br />monitor subsidence at the New Elk Mine. Mining during the permit term will be in the non- <br />renewable resource areas as shown on Map 20, Sheets 1-3—Structure Inventory. Renewable <br />resources will not be undermined with retreat - mining methods. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.