My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1994082 (16)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
_INSPECTION - C1994082 (16)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2020 5:29:43 PM
Creation date
11/30/2011 7:35:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Roy Karo - Seneca Coal Company, LLC
Inspection Date
11/23/2011
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 23, 2011 C-1994-082/Yoast Mine SLB <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> NA -Air Resource Protection N -Roads <br /> N -Availability of Records N -Reclamation Success <br /> Y -Backfill &Grading N -Revegetation <br /> NA -Excess Spoil and Dev.Waste NA - Subsidence <br /> NA -Explosives R - Slides and Other Damage <br /> N -Fish &Wildlife NA - Support Facilities On-site <br /> R -Hydrologic Balance N - Signs and Markers <br /> Y -Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan NA - Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> NA -Other NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br /> NA -Processing Waste N -Topsoil <br /> COMMENTS <br /> This was a partial inspection of the Yoast Mine based on aerial photographs of the site taken by Harry Ranney of <br /> DRMS and reviewed by Susan Burgmaier of DRMS. The south pit,north pit,and neck pit areas were all <br /> photographed. The site was covered in snow,with the exception of the south facing slope of Pond 012. There <br /> were no signs of recent activity on site, and it did not look as though there had been any vehicular traffic on the <br /> snow covered roads. <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, <br /> 4.05.6, Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10, Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water <br /> Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage —Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; <br /> Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> Ponds 011A, 012, 012A, 013, and 014 all held water. Pond 012 appeared to be discharging; it was not <br /> apparent whether any of the other ponds were discharging. <br /> SLIDES and DAMAGE -Rule 4.12: <br /> The Pond 012 slide appeared to be stable. The north slope had wet areas,but it did not appear to have <br /> sloughed or slumped anywhere along the newly regraded slope. The Pond 013 slide also appeared stable,with no <br /> evidence of recent sloughing. The neck pit slide area also looked stable. Neither the Pond 013 or Neck Pit slides <br /> were discharging water or seeping. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 8 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.