My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-11-22_REVISION - C1992081
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2011-11-22_REVISION - C1992081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:45:17 PM
Creation date
11/29/2011 8:20:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/22/2011
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR1
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) are four times higher for water <br />coming from the Rail Loop Pond than water from the Truck Loop Pond; <br />however, TDS concentrations coming from the ponds are generally less than <br />ambient concentrations in Dry Creek upstream. Existing water quality in Dry <br />Creek is unsuitable for irrigation and only marginally suitable for livestock. <br />The majority of the runoff from the Rail Loop Pond, as well as the runoff <br />from the three small area exemptions in the Loadout area, is not treated; <br />however, runoff from these sources do not appear to be affecting water <br />quality. No adverse impacts from mining operations were projected in the <br />HGT permit application and none have been observed to date. <br />Runoff from the Loadout area that is not diverted around the area of <br />disturbance is retained 111 sedimentation ponds for a maximum of 30 10U1J. <br />Water retained in the two sedimentation ponds experiences some losses <br />through evaporation and seepage. The Dry Creek diversion downstream <br />could potentially be impacted by loses of water due to storage in the sediment <br />ponds. <br />The acreage served by the two sediment ponds accounts for less than one - <br />thousandth of the acreage drained by Dry Creek. Since the area to be <br />affected is a fraction of the total watershed, the watershed will not be <br />significantly affected and runoff from the permit area will continue to reach <br />Dry Creek. <br />All waters utilized for dust suppression, showers, and other operations at the <br />Loadout are piped in from a well in the Yampa River alluvium (H -G Shallow <br />Well No. 1), located two miles north of the Loadout. HGT owns the water <br />rights for this well. HGT owns an additional 90 acre -feet of water rights in <br />the downstream Walker Ditch, which are not currently being utilized. <br />These water rights can be utilized to compensate any downstream users for <br />loss of water due to consumption at the Loadout. In addition, HGT has an <br />agreement with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to <br />mitigate against losses of water to the Yampa River as a result of water <br />consumption at the Loadout. Please refer to Volume 2, Tab 21 of the permit <br />application and Item XII of this document. <br />2: Ground Water Impacts <br />The Lewis shale has low conductivity values and is generally considered to <br />be an aquitard that retards transmission of surface water to the Twentymile <br />Sandstone, the underlying regional aquifer. This low conductivity results in <br />low well yields that preclude the use of waters from the Lewis shale for other <br />than stock watering (See Seneca II -W Permit, C -1982 -057, Tab 7). Water <br />samples from the two existing alluvial wells at the Loadout, which are <br />completed in part in the underlying Lewis shale, often exceed water quality <br />Hayden Gulch Loadout 24 November 22, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.