My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-20_INSPECTION - C1980006
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1980006
>
2011-10-20_INSPECTION - C1980006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:44:10 PM
Creation date
11/9/2011 12:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
10/20/2011
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
George Patterson
Inspection Date
10/18/2011
Email Name
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 18, 2011 C- 1980 - 006 /Marc Mine RDZ <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y= Inspected N =Not Inspected R= Comments Noted V= Violation Issued NA =Not Applicable <br />NA -Air Resource Protection <br />N -Roads <br />N -Availability of Records <br />R -Reclamation Success <br />N - Backfill & Grading <br />N - Revegetation <br />NA - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste <br />NA - Subsidence <br />NA - Explosives <br />N - Slides and Other Damage <br />N - Fish & Wildlife <br />N - Support Facilities On -site <br />R - Hydrologic Balance <br />N -Signs and Markers <br />R - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan <br />NA - Support Facilities Not On -site <br />R - Other <br />NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br />NA - Processing Waste <br />R - Topsoil <br />COMMENTS <br />The inspection covered the loadout area but not the mine site. The weather was clear and the ground was dry. <br />Present during the inspection were: Rena Brand of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; George Patterson of Energy <br />Fuels Coal Inc.; Jim Mossman, a consultant for Energy Fuels; and Kent Crofts, another consultant for Energy <br />Fuels. Ms. Brand was visiting the site to make a Jurisdictional Determination. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 <br />Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.053; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, <br />4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring <br />4.05.13; Drainage — Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />At the loadout, the pond has been drained of water, except for a small amount, and the embankment has been <br />breached. Straw wattles were in place below the breached portion of the embankment. If the pond is not filled in <br />soon, the dam will need to be rebuilt. <br />GENERAL MINE PLAN COMPLANCE: <br />The mine was found to be in general compliance with the permit. <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS - Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br />The parcels at the mine site and the loadout appeared to be in good condition as no erosion, large weed patches, or <br />large bare areas were observed. Some tire tracks were seen, due to vehicle access to the pond work, but do not <br />appear to be a problem as no large ruts were seen. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.