Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4, Item 6(B) — Radium in the Mine Pool <br />Section 9(b) (iv) 2. Evaluation of Chemical Trends in Mine Water as a Function of Time (page 9- <br />43). Uranium is but one of several constituents that are of concern in the mine pool. For <br />example, radium -226 concentrations in the mine pool are significantly elevated above standard <br />and have shown a disturbing long -term increasing trend going back to December 1998. Please <br />provide your assessment as to why the radium -226 concentration has shown such a significant <br />increase in the mine pool). <br />RESPONSE: <br />Cotter Corporation (N.S.L.)'s Response to December 14, 2010 Adequacy Review, <br />Comments 6(B) & 11 (B) <br />May 6, 2011 <br />It appears that the basis for the "significant increase" conclusion in the above statement is the <br />single December 1998 sample of mine pool water analyzed for radium -226. The radium -226 <br />sample collected in 1998 did not represent mine filling, because the pumps were not shut off on <br />the 19 Level until May 2000. Radium -226 concentrations increased as water levels rose and <br />water in the mine pool contacted wall rock. (Figure 1, Figure 2). The radium -226 concentration <br />of the first sample collected during initial mine filling was 150 pCi/L. Radium -226 <br />concentrations slowly increased to about 207 pCi /L as the mine pool water level rose to 5,749 ft <br />amsl on January 23, 2002 (Figure 1). The increase in radium -226 concentrations during mine <br />filling was likely due to the mine pool coming in contact with wall rock. <br />Since 2007, radium concentrations have ranged from 207 pCi/L to 254 pCi/L (Figure 3) with the <br />lowest values measured in March, 2009 (135 pCi /L). Profile sampling of Schwartzwalder mine <br />pool water conducted in 2010 indicated that the mine pool was highly reduced from the surface <br />to a depth of 800 ft below the surface. Under these highly reducing conditions, uranium <br />concentrations were consistent throughout the mine pool while radium concentrations varied at <br />depth (Figure 4) showing no discernible pattern. <br />Although radium -226 concentrations are elevated in the mine pool, radium concentrations are <br />typically well below water quality standard (5 pCi /L) in samples from alluvial monitoring wells <br />and in Ralston Creek, because radium is insoluble in oxidizing environments. Radium's <br />immobility in oxidizing environments and mobility in reducing environments is well - <br />documented (Ames, et al. 1983; Banks, et al. 1995; Langmuir & Riese, 1985; Szabo and <br />Zapecza, 1991). <br />Radium immobility in oxidizing environments results from both solubility and sorption <br />reactions. Radium forms a positively charged divalent cation in solution, similar to barium, <br />calcium, and strontium, in natural waters. Radium solubility is typically controlled by its co- <br />precipitation within sulfate minerals (e.g. barite and gypsum). Radium adsorption on iron - <br />hydroxides is well- documented in natural systems (Schott and Wiegand, 2003). Under oxidizing <br />conditions iron- and manganese- hydroxides can form, adsorbing radium efficiently (Zwalen, et <br />al. 2007). <br />1 <br />