My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-25_REVISION - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2011-10-25_REVISION - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:44:20 PM
Creation date
11/8/2011 12:46:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/25/2011
Doc Name
Review
From
IRIS Mitigation and Design, Inc.
To
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Type & Sequence
TR18
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Common Name <br />Scientific Name <br />Narrowleaf cottonwood <br />Populus angustifolia <br />Alder <br />Alnus incana <br />River Birch <br />Betula occidentalis <br />Peachleaf willow <br />Salix amygdaloides <br />Plains cottonwood <br />Populus deltoides <br />Lanceleaf cottonwood <br />Populus x acuminata <br />IRIS <br />MITIGATION AND DESIGN, INC. <br />Environmental Consulting <br />Table 2 <br />Riparian Trees for Mitigation <br />IRIS MITIGATION AND DESIGN, INC. <br />3450 W. 32nd Avenue, 2 Floor <br />Denver, Colorado 80211 <br />Phone: 720 - 272 -1985 <br />bleisure@irismitigation.com <br />Comment 3: So the financial assurances should be for more than the total indicated. We <br />should know more about the DRMS bond. I would like the portion for Preble's mitigation to be <br />fairly substantial. In the unlikely event that the whole project tanked, someone would have to <br />address impacts of the upstream wall being left in place. <br />Response 3: Depending on the type of mitigation that we are proposing, we have calculated <br />estimated costs for mitigation activities on a unit cost basis depending on the type of mitigation <br />proposed (i.e. riparian/upland, grasses /shrubs /willows /trees, etc.). Table 3 lists Phase 1 <br />mitigation areas, unit costs for mitigation and costs for each area, with an overall cost with a <br />15% contingency provided at the bottom of the table. Unit costs were developed based on <br />Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) cost data and IRIS' and WWE's <br />past experience with similar projects. The details of the financial assurances will be addressed in <br />accordance with the DRMS Hard Rock Mining Regulations. <br />Schwartzwalder Mine Phase 1 Page 7 October 2011 <br />Response to USFWS Comments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.