My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-11-03_INSPECTION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2011-11-03_INSPECTION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:44:45 PM
Creation date
11/8/2011 10:54:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
11/3/2011
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Mountain Coal Company
Inspection Date
11/2/2011
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 2, 2011 C- 1980- 007/West Elk Mine MPB <br />Robin Schiro and Ryan Sweetwood then accompanied me to the site of the test to inspect the river. I directed <br />MCC personnel to collect field parameter information and we inspected the river to determine if collecting <br />samples for laboratory analysis would be warranted. Ryan Sweetwood waded to the other side of the river where <br />blue flags were still in place indicating the location of the transect lines. We collected pH, temperature and <br />conductivity data at four locations including upstream of the point of input and below at the first three transect line <br />locations (see Photograph No. 4). The data were recorded electronically and provided to the Division via <br />facsimile later that day. The data do not show any significant anomalies with regard to pH, temperature, and <br />conductivity between the upstream versus three downstream sample points. Since there was no physical evidence <br />or visual indication of remnant dye or other environmental damage it was determined that collecting samples for <br />laboratory analysis was not warranted at the time of the inspection. The field data listed below is shown as it was <br />provided by MCC. <br />North Fork of Gunnison River Samples <br />Transect <br />55 <br />57 <br />59 <br />Time pH Temperatureff) Conductivity (umhos /cm) <br />2:18PM 8.18 5.20 200.7 <br />2:20PM 8.20 <br />Prior to pt of input <br />8.21 <br />8.26 <br />6.00 <br />5.60 <br />4.70 <br />228.0 <br />211.0 <br />208.5 <br />Following collection of field parameter data and inspection of the mixing zone study location we returned to the <br />MCC offices where we concluded the site inspection. I stated to MCC personnel that I found no visual evidence <br />of environmental impact or any remnants of the dye during my inspection and that I would review the information <br />with Senior Staff and provide MCC a written inspection report. <br />DOCUMENTS RECEIVED <br />None <br />OTHER (SPECIFY) <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 6 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.