Laserfiche WebLink
Table 9 <br />Comparison of WWL Predictions of Water Quality -• <br />in the North Fork of the Purgatoire River <br />with Actual Monitoring Results <br />Change in Concentration (mg/1) and Absolute Change io Value <br />Low Flow Mean Flow <br />Average (5 cfs) (20 cfs) Mean <br />Chemical Concentration at WWL Original WWL Original Concentration <br />Constituent Stonewall Projection Projection at P1tS-3 PF:S-3 11/93' <br />HCO~ 119 ISS 12.7 211 170 <br />Ca 38 36 37.8 47 44 <br />CI 1.4 1.76 1.5 2.5 3 <br />F 0.3 0.38 0.31 1.1 .3 <br />Fe 0.44 0.41 0.43 <0.27 .15 <br />Mg 7.4 7.1 7.3 9.2 9 <br />Mn 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.22 9 <br />K L4 1.65 L47 1.1 1 <br />Na 9.0 29 14.3 13.6 9 <br />SO, 36 45 38.3 34.8 27 <br />TDS 166 213 179 213.7 210 <br />Table 10 <br />Prediction of Golden Eagle Mine Discharge on Quality <br />of Water in the North Fork of the Purgatoire River <br />at Low Flow (4 cfs) and Mean Flow (20 cfs)' <br />Change in Concentration (mg/1) and Absolute Change in Value <br />Low Flow (4 cfs) Mean Flow (20 cfs) <br />Average <br />Chemical Concentration <br />Constituent at Stonewall Current Life of Mine Current Life of Mine <br />HCO~ l l9 199(+80) 234(+115) 136 (+17) 145 (+26) <br />Ca 38 35(-3) 33(-5) 37.3(-.7) 37(-1) <br />CI 1.4 3.21(+L81) 4.0(+2.6) I.8(+.4) 2(+.6) <br />F 0.3 0.84(+.54) LI(+.8) 0.4(+.1) 0.48(+.18) <br />Fe 0.44 0.67(+.23) 0.77(.33) 0.5(+.6) 0.52(+.OS) <br />Mg 7.4 6.8(-.6) 6.6(-.8) 7.3 (-.1) 7.22(+.18) <br />Mn 0.012 0.02(+.008) 0.02(+.008) 0.01(-.002) 0.01(+.002) <br />K l.4 1.53(+.13) 1.58(+.IS) 1.43(+.03) 1.44(+.04) <br />Na 9.0 50(+.41) 69(+60) 18(+9) 22.6(+13.6) <br />SO, 36 35(-1) 34.5(-i.5) 35.8(-.2) 35.7(+.3) <br />TDS 166 382(+216) 479(+313) 213(+47) 237(+7l) <br />• <br />• <br />Assumes mine dacharge = mint inFlnw m OAfi3 ch in 1993 and 0 %07 c(s for the life of mme. Quality is <br />bawd on maximum lever observed in the Golden Eacle Mine JiscF.arge, with the encepunn nl chloride, for <br />u hich the mcan u'as uscd. <br />Flow nl 13.13 cf'.. <br />