My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-26_PERMIT FILE - C1981012 (24)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-09-26_PERMIT FILE - C1981012 (24)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:23 PM
Creation date
11/3/2011 11:38:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/26/2011
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 08 HYDROLOGY AND GEOLOGY INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r. ¢, rya. ~reti,~8 <br />areal extent of the mine (Table ~ to determine mine inflow from the face and roof respet:tively. <br />Three scenarios were exa++~+ned: the existing co~guradon of the Golden Eagle Mine, the <br />configuration for the current permit tens, and the life-of--mine configuration. Case II inflow <br />predictions utilizing the maximum coal trancm~ivity of.1.98 ftZ/day appeared to best neptrstet <br />the situation currently observed at the mine (T'abte ~. <br />Currently the mine is producing an average of 0.14 gpm/acre of mine. Over the last five year, <br />inflow has ranged fiom 0.09 gpm/acre to 0.125 gpm/acre. Figure 6 is a diagram of seepage <br />rates by acres of mined coal over time. This curve corresponds well with the seepage rates <br />anticipated in the 1980 study, ate, due to the homogeneity of saadgraphy, structural geology, <br />topography, and climate, may represent a good way to project future inflows based on total acres <br />mined. Figure 6 also shows a graph of inflows from shafts and holes by acres of mined coal. <br />The slight decline in gpm/acre might represent an offset from dewatering of perched water tables <br />at old sites to additional inflow from newer sites. <br />There will continue to be a constant inflow of 80 to 100 gpm associated with the SE-1 TG fault. <br />The mine is currently using the dischazge for underground dust suppression activities. Should <br />the mine encounter another fault of comparable magnitude, inflows will increase beyond the • <br />current projection. The station for measuring the flow from the fault was relocated, and now <br />includes some seepage flow (results in an apparent increase in fault flow and decrease in area <br />seepage). The flow from the fault itself may be leveling off to a sustained production t'rom <br />recharge. <br />During the third quarter of 1989, the New Elk Mine was temporarily sealed. Previous mine <br />inflow studies recorded inflows of approximately 123 gpm, of which 109 gpm was being <br />generated from mined out areas totaling approximately 2800 acres. Any mine inflows are <br />currently flooding the abandoned mine workings. <br />An estimation of the extent of flooding within the workings was made. This analysis assumed <br />that all azeas of the mine below the elevation of 7062' were equally flooded. A copy of the <br />mine map was acquired and the extent of mains was measured at 286 acres. The coal reportedly <br />averaged 8 feet in height in this area, and the mining resulted in 70 percent recovery of the coal. <br />The length of the flood limit line on the floor of the mine is 13850 feet. <br />(286 ac) x (43560 ft2/ac) x (8 ft) x (60%) = 59,799,168 ft' <br />(if flooded from floor to roof), minus <br />(8 ft) x (13850 ft) x (8 ft) / (4.5%) / 2 = 9,848,889 ft <br />(perimeter correction), equals <br />• <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.