My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-31_REVISION - M1976009HR (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976009
>
2011-10-31_REVISION - M1976009HR (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:22 PM
Creation date
11/1/2011 10:38:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976009HR
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/31/2011
Doc Name
Submittal
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was pushed eastward it encountered resistance from mainly Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary <br />beds. Where the Precambrian granites and the more recent sedimentary rocks met, many of the <br />sedimentary rocks were lifted upward and rotated so the previous flat -lying beds steeply dipped <br />to the east or even became vertically oriented. In some places, such as Cheyenne Mountain <br />located to the south of the Menzer Quarry, the granite rode over the sediments, flipping them <br />over and then often burying them under thousands of feet of granite. This kind of thrust faulting <br />is more commonly seen in Wyoming and is unusual along the Colorado mountain front on the <br />east side of the Rockies. <br />On the southeast side of Pikes Peak where the Menzer Quarry is located, the eastward <br />movement of Pikes Peak essentially plowed the earth in front of it. This "plowing" extensively <br />fractured the granite into huge blocks or chunks that were then tumbled together in a highly <br />variable agglomeration of most if not all the variety of rock types found in the Pikes Peak granite. <br />As a result of erosion during primarily the Pleistocene, these rocks were exposed. <br />As expected, the on -site rocks vary widely from place to place and the entire mass is <br />devoid of any identifiable structure. Although this makes mining difficult because the quality of <br />the rock varies greatly over sometimes short distances, it also has the advantage in that the <br />resulting topography is very stable. With so much variety, weak rocks that, in larger masses, <br />could be prone to failure are held in place by surrounding hard rocks. In many of the exposed <br />walls at the Menzer Quarry this "structure" is quite visible. <br />No major faults extend through the area, although to the east were the granites and the <br />sedimentary beds meet, there are probably large faults. The more or less linear form of Turkey <br />Creek Canyon could be a fault line, but no information has been found to verify that the canyon <br />is anything other than a steep, stream cut canyon bounded on the east by very resistant granites <br />that form the towering cliffs in the canyon downstream from the quarry. Even if there was a fault <br />there, it would only encounter the quarry area on the far eastern edge. <br />Although features have been found in the course of the mining that look like faults, these <br />often turn out to be comparatively short boundaries between two very large blocks of rock. Thus, <br />these are more like joints than faults. <br />Sometimes, the joints generate a small amount of water when they are exposed. But these <br />seeps quickly dry out and the few that persist with weeping show no signs of motion between <br />adjacent blocks of rock. This is consistent with experiences in drilling water wells in the <br />surrounding countryside. The wells rarely produce more than a very few gallons per minute and <br />many of those soon go dry. As is evident in examining the quarry, there is not much water <br />contained in this jumble of rock. What water there is tends to be confined to small joints between <br />blocks. Furthermore, encountering wet rock during the mining does not occur. <br />(2) On a site - specific basis, an Applicant shall be required to provide engineering stability analyses for proposed <br />final reclaimed slopes, highwalls, waste piles and embankments. An Applicant may also be required to provide <br />engineering stability analyses for certain slopes configuration as they will occur during operations, including, but not <br />limited to embankments. Information for slope stability analyses may include, but would not be limited to, slope <br />angles and configurations, compaction and density, physical characteristics of earthen materials, pore pressure <br />information, slope height, post - placement use of site, and information on structures or facilities that could be <br />adversely affected by slope failure. <br />Shortly after the amendment in the mid- 1990's, mining on the south side of the quarry <br />produced a benching pattern with walls 50 to 60 feet high and benches about 25 to 30 feet wide. <br />Menzer Quarry Corrective Action Amendment Rule 6.5 October 2011 Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.