My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-31_REVISION - M1976009HR (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976009
>
2011-10-31_REVISION - M1976009HR (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:22 PM
Creation date
11/1/2011 10:38:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976009HR
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/31/2011
Doc Name
Submittal
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grading <br />Reclamation Plan <br />Stream Corridor Area: Grading of the 6,762 square feet of disturbed land beyond the original <br />affected land boundary primarily involved rehabilitation of the stream channel. Although a good deal <br />of rock also spilled on to the east bank of the stream, those damages were quite superficial and <br />primarily affected woody, streamside vegetation. In only a few places was the surface soil disturbed <br />(perhaps 300 square feet) with the remainder still in good to excellent condition. When the rocks <br />were cleaned up they were lifted vertically by a backhoe with a claw on the bucket, thereby avoiding <br />any more than superficial damage to the soil. <br />The stream channel was cleaned of spill rock as well as the sizeable volume of older rocks that <br />had slid down the original steep slope above this area since the landslide estimated at about 150 to <br />250 years old. When that was completed it left a stream channel that was considerably cleaner than <br />the channel downstream from this area, but not as clean as the stream channel upstream from this <br />area. It was reasoned that because of its location and geological history it would be better to put some <br />rock back into the bed to simulate the channel downstream. Because the stream course in this area <br />flows across the remains of an old landslide there is an elevation drop across this area that is greater <br />than is normally seen along the stream. Leaving the channel as clean as the channel upstream would <br />encourage some rapid headward erosion as the channel attempts to smooth its profile. Therefore, <br />rock in the 12" to 18" size was replaced in the channel as that is the range of larger rock sizes <br />downstream. <br />In the process of rehabilitating this area it was found that the material under the natural stream <br />channel seems to contain a sizeable amount of larger rock that came down in the landslide. Very <br />minor water flows after the rehabilitation work was completed simply sank into the slide debris <br />rather than flowing over it. This water would seep out and form shallow puddles in the channel on <br />the downstream side of the old landslide. This type of behavior is typical of landslides into streams <br />because the slide debris is quite porous and remains porous for a long time after the slide until all the <br />spaces between the larger stones in the debris can fill with fine sediment. Even then, slide debris can <br />be significant sub - surface reservoirs for water. Care was taken throughout the rehabilitation to not <br />disturb these characteristics of the stream channel <br />Rehabilitation of Access Lands: As described in the Mining Plan (Exhibit D), a debris filled <br />meander was discovered on the west side of the stream and within the original affected land <br />boundary. Access to clean the stream channel and east bank was across this area, but at the time it <br />was not known there was up to 30 or 35 feet of landslide debris beside the stream. It was thought to <br />be sloping bedrock covered by several feet of talus and spill rock. What resulted after the <br />rehabilitation was done, was a wide bench where the old meander had been. This is backed by about <br />a 25 to 35 foot high wall of rock that formed the west bank of the stream before the landslide filled <br />this area with debris. <br />Menzer Quarry Corrective Action Amendment Exhibit E October 2011 Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.