Laserfiche WebLink
Menzer Quarry Corrective Action Amendment Exhibit D October 2011 Page 4 <br />Mining Plan <br />stream channel picking up rock and loading it into a truck that came down the same road. This crude <br />road was very carefully constructed so the large haul truck would be able to get up the road after it <br />had come down the road. <br />After the stream corridor had been cleared of spill rock, the track hoe began to work back up the <br />slope, producing a final grade as it went. Attempts were made to try and remove only the spill rock <br />from the stream corridor while leaving the original rock, but that approach quickly became <br />unworkable. Therefore, most of the rock was removed and then rock was replaced in the stream bed <br />to produce a condition approximating the original, pre -spill condition. Essentially, rock size and <br />density was replaced in a fashion that was similar to the natural rock in the channel downstream from <br />the spill. This was a bit less rocky than the original, but it eliminated a slow spot in the stream flow <br />that often created minor ponding upstream and tended to drain slowly, even before any mining was <br />done or the spill occurred. <br />Rock removed from the east bank, which suffered very little physical damage to the soil, was <br />carefully done so the original land surface was left in place. Basically, each rock was picked up <br />vertically leaving the underlying soil disturbed to the minimal amount possible. Vegetation <br />topgrowth, of course, was damaged, but the root mass was left undisturbed. As the plants are mostly <br />streamside shrubs, the roots should quickly send up new shoots. This will lead to a rapid recovery of <br />the stream shore much like it originally was. Isolated, outlying rocks were removed by hand. <br />It is very important to note that at no time after the spillage occurred or during the rehabilitation <br />process did Turkey Creek produce any flow. Therefore, there was no need to make provision for <br />sediment control or other activities to protect the water resources. No water was ever encountered <br />during the entire process. <br />As the track hoe moved out of the canyon and back up the slope, removing spill rock as it went, <br />it began to excavate and shape the lower portions of the spill slope. It was then that it was found that <br />no matter how deep the track hoe reached it did not hit bedrock. The original intent was to create a <br />somewhat rocky final surface similar to the scree slope that had been there. Unfortunately, that <br />became impossible as the underlying material seemed to extend deep into the ground. The more the <br />track hoe dug into the material the more the final configuration was looking more like a bench than a <br />slope. About 35 feet west of the stream, a vertical wall of bedrock was encountered. It was at that <br />time that it was decided to leave a broad, nearly level bench beside the stream channel, backed by <br />solid rock on the west and the south. The bench would start at about 5 to 6 feet above the assumed <br />stream channel mean water line. This was on the north end of the bench. The bench would then have <br />a very gradual uphill slope to the south until it met the bounding bedrock on the south. Adding the <br />rise of the bench and the decline of the stream channel, the south end of the bench would have a <br />height of about 12 to 15 feet above the assumed stream channel mean water line. The boundary <br />between the bench and the stream would then be lined with large rock to reduce westward cutting of <br />the stream during high water. <br />As the track hoe moved to the top of the wall on the west side of the bench, it completed the <br />excavation of the bench area leaving solid rock bounding the bench. Thus the channel was restored <br />in the same location and configuration with regard to gradient as it was before the slide, but with <br />