My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2009-03-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:44 PM
Creation date
11/1/2011 7:29:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
3/25/2009
Doc Name
Dam Seepage Pipeline Replacement EPF PE Certification.
From
Climax
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Surge Riser <br />A portion of the existing 12 -inch HDPE pipeline that connects to a riser on the west side <br />of the valley was connected to the diesel pump tee. This riser is used to absorb <br />pressure surges caused by pump start-up or shut-down. <br />Proiect Construction <br />The construction of the new 5 Dam Seepwater pipeline began in early September 2008. <br />The construction started at the "1/2 way cutout' end of the new pipeline and progressed <br />back towards the high point vent. The actual "% way cutout" connection was the last <br />section of the new pipeline to be installed. <br />There was a minor change in the pipeline routing requested by the contractor. It was <br />decided to route the pipeline around some power pole guy wires at the groin of 5 Dam <br />rather than place the pipeline under the guy wires. This change did not affect the <br />operation of the pipeline. The pipe trench is outside the limits of 5 Dam and did not affect <br />its structure. Other than this change, the pipeline basically followed the planned route. <br />The pipeline was specified to be buried with a minimum of 5 feet of ground cover over <br />the top of the pipe to prevent any issues with the water in it freezing and protection from <br />road construction work. <br />Because the existing seepwater system had to remain operational until the new pipeline <br />was ready for use, it was necessary to leave much of the existing pipeline in the ground <br />and install the new pipeline beside or in some locations over the top of it. <br />There were delays in receiving the stainless steel spool pieces required for the project. <br />These delays contributed significantly to overall delay of the project completion. <br />Construction Issues <br />The biggest challenge for the project construction was the weather. The project started <br />late and this caused difficulties as the weather changed from summer to winter <br />conditions. This slowed excavation, caused freezing problems with bedding and backfill, <br />and slowed down the entire work process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.