My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2011-06-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981038 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:31 PM
Creation date
10/31/2011 1:57:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/15/2011
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 9B Archaeology Appendix Table of Contents Part 1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18089). This date places the occupation in the early Forrttntive Period <br />~. of ca. A.D. 500 - A.D. 1200. The occupation is clearly an ephemeral <br />one, perhaps a seasonal hunting cane. The only material cultural <br />besides flakes and flake tools, was a small corner notched projectile <br />point and two small wid blades or preforms. The feature area was about <br />5 x 5 meters square and was approximately 75 percent excavated. It's <br />National Register eligibility has been irt~aired as a by-product of the <br />excavation program but it could still be eligible because there may be <br />more of a ax~onent involved. Outlying test excavations indicate the <br />site extends further east in an area which was not excavated. Also, <br />there is an even lacer terrace which was not tested. The project <br />sponsor asked the excavations not be expended beyond the knaan feature <br />areas. <br />While SdP271 was probably once a National Register eligible <br />resource, its eligibility has been diminished as part of the <br />archaeological effort. This is due to the small fragile nature of its <br />ang~onents. IIwugh questions remain, however, to suggest that its <br />Register eligiblity should be reconsidered in the event the resource is <br />ever threatened. As the nearby portal development is now understood, <br />havever, SI7I271 is neither within the area of undertaking nor will be <br />iu~actsd by it. The resource would not seem to warrent futtller <br />1 consideration in relation to Colorado Westrroreland's current plans. <br />• <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />• <br />' 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.