Laserfiche WebLink
SECPION III <br />J • PROBLFS7 ORIENTATION AND RESFAItC1~ RATIONALE <br />Centuries Research was contracted by Colorado Westmoreland to <br />crnQlete an evaluation of 517T271 in order to determine the site's <br />eligibility for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. <br />Centuries' plan was to aco~lish this by means of a controlled test <br />program designed to test the site content, extent and stratigraphy. <br />National Register eligibility wuld then be judged in terms of site <br />stratigraphy, size, ~ntext and cultural identity as these elements <br />might together indicate potential for yielding infornation important in <br />the prehistory of the North Fork Valley. If such potential were <br />indicated, the site might be determined eligible under eligibility <br />Criteria D of the National Historic Preservation Act. A report was also <br />to be prepared in keeping with bureau of Land Management and State <br />Historic Preservation Office standards. <br />As outlined in the 1984 baseline inventory and the 1986 inventory <br />for the Orchard Valley Mine, the prehistory of the North Fork Valley is <br />virtually unwritten. It was only in the past two years that sane idea <br />^ . <br />1 <br />`J <br /> <br />1 <br />• <br />of site density and d~.strrbutron rn the area was gained as a result of <br />the work for Colorado Westmoreland. All that was even then known was <br />that a focus of prehistoric cultural resources could be found at the <br />mouth of the tributary valleys of the North Fork, where streanLS issued <br />fran the high bluffs onto the upper benches of the larger valley. There <br />is as yet not enough information on hand to make much camp~t about date <br />ranges or cultural affiliation for these resources except to state that <br />they appear to be of a generalized Archaic-like identity which is <br />typical of the Great Basin culture area. <br />Beyond the local North Fork archaeological focus, it was <br />anticipated that the test program might yield information that would <br />contribute to our knowledge of Colorado's west central prehistoric <br />culture orontext and its relationship within the larger Great Basin <br />culture area. The prehistory of this area, as the here of the Ute <br />People is still only understood in a very limited way. As outlined by <br />Feed, prominent regional research concerns include: 1) a dearth of <br />excavation data; 2) chronology; 3) settlement patterns; 4) cultural <br />processes; 5) demography; and 6) site significance. Reed discussed <br />these problems in his review of the status of archaeological knowledge <br />in the region. In doing so, he affirmed the need for straight-forward <br />excavation data on regional prehistory. <br />It was against the regional research background sa[rt~rized by Reed <br />that the excavation program at 5DT271 was initiated. The first <br />obligation was to see if there was an <br />to the research danai~s outlined <br />chronological occupational record of <br />this record is as follows: <br />y archaeological potential relative <br />by Feed within the generalized <br />the area. As outlined by Reed, <br />11 <br />