Laserfiche WebLink
0 Limited- Results Cultural Resource Survey Form <br />(page 3 of 3) <br />V. LITERATURE REVIEW (continued) <br />25. Known Cultural Resources <br />In the project area: None. <br />In the general region: Several cultural resources have been recorded within a mile of the discrete project <br />areas and are listed on an attached table. Additionally, an overview of the prehistory of the area is <br />"Colorado Prehistory: A Context for the Northern Colorado Plateau" (Reed and Metcalf 1999) and anan <br />overview for the history of the area published by the same organization is entitled "Colorado History <br />A Context for Historical Archaeology" (Church et al. 2007). <br />26. Expected Results: No significant cultural resources were expected of the low density of sites <br />recorded by large block surveys in the area and the heave vegetation cover. <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. The purpose of the study was to identify and record all cultural remains over 50 years old within the <br />areas of potential impact, to assess their significance and eligibility to the National Register of Historic <br />Places (NRHP), and make recommendations concerning management If possible the remains will <br />add to our understanding of the prehistory and history of the region <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site: Sites were defined as a discrete locus of patterned activity weater than 50 years of age and <br />consisting of five or more prehistoric artifacts with or without features or over 50 historic artifacts with associated <br />features. Also, single isolated hearths with no other associated artifacts or features were to be recorded as a site. <br />IF: Isolated finds were defined as less than five artifacts without associated features Exceptions to this definition <br />include historic trash dumps without associated features: a single core reduction event with a single core and <br />associated reduction debita e; a single pot drop where the sherds are from a single vessel: or, a prospector pit <br />with/or without artifacts and no associated historic structures or features. <br />29. Describe Survey Method:: A 100 percent pedestrian cultural resources survey _ofthe three drill hole locations <br />was conducted by one archaeologist walking transects spaced 15 meters apart to cover three 5 -acre block areas for <br />the drill holes. The proposed linear routes were inspected b walking parallel transects based on the flagged routes <br />and spaced at 15m to cover 200'(60m) wide corridors. A total of approximately 24 acres of private land was <br />surveyed. The survey was limited by heavy vegetation cover. <br />VIII. RESULTS <br />30. List IFs if applicable. Indicate IF locations on the map completed for Part III. <br />A. Smithsonian Number: Description: <br />31. Using your professional knowledge of the region, why are there none or very limited cultural <br />0 remains in the project area? Is there subsurface potential? <br />The cultural resource potential of this region is limited by slope and heavy vegetation cover. <br />Subsurface cultural deposits are not expected and no further work is recommended. <br />