Laserfiche WebLink
(c) Cause instability in the disposal areas. <br />TC has an existing apprnzed call urine zeaste disposal facility (Coal Refuse Disposal Area (CRDA)), zehidh <br />currently rewizes caxl processing Taste from the Washplant at the Foidel Creek Mine The inherent practical and <br />operational problem zeith the regulatory definitions and pvzisions is that the CDRMS interprets Rule 4.10.1(1)(b) <br />as mining that no combustibk materials can be placed in the CRDA. As a practical consideration, rand dear -up <br />materials and other zeaste materials from undergroumg zehich fall under the wry broad definition and CDRMS <br />interpretation ij "underground dezelopnrnt zeaste", may contain metal, pieces of cinder block, woolen blares or <br />pieces f timber, pies of coal, coal dust, rock dust etc Gizen the restriction on "cnrrhustible materials" and the <br />practical difficulty 1 separating the materials, the materials cannot be placed in the existing CRDA, and TC <br />has, therefore, had raid dean -up materials laded and transported to an approzed off site disposal facility <br />3) The CDRMS has through prior decisions and ongoing inspection practices, created and <br />perpetrated confusion relative to permit requirements and what constitutes acceptable practices <br />It wars nezer TC's intent that any zeaste materials from the Foidel Creek Mine be transported to and disposed tin <br />the Deakins Pit The Minerals Group, hozeezer, through approzal of a permit allozeing disposal of nnterial <br />containing tail, and implied consent ozer a period of tine which induded multiple inspections of the Deakins Pit, <br />established and perpetuated the cunaption that placnrnt and disposal (fcazl wastes in the Pit zeas acceptable This <br />con eption indirectly influenced the independent decisions and actions of Bozeer Brothers, in dizerting and waste from <br />the Foidel Creek Mine Gizen the existence this permit; and the language of Rule 4.10.1(2), it is not <br />unreasonabk to conclude that the Deakins Pit is zeithin a permit area (Minerals Permit) and that coal mine waste <br />disposal has been "approzed by the Dizision': <br />In addition to these issues, it is important to note that the identified waste materials of concern (with the <br />exception of the screened coal and coal fines piles at the Ross Pit, and what is identified as Stockpile 2 on <br />page 15 of the 08/18/11 CDRMS Inspection Report) are predominantly mud and clay materials. In <br />addition, any coal and coal - related waste materials from the Foidel Creek Mine should not be a concern <br />relative to surface or groundwater, since coal and overburden materials have been characterized and <br />documented as non -toxic and non acid - forming. <br />In conclusion, TC questions the basis for the NOV and whether it should have been issued to TC, <br />as further detailed by the following comments: <br />Failure to place all underground dezelopnrnt zeaste in existing disposal areas approzed by the Dizision zeithin the <br />Permit Area - Most underground development material either remains underground in abandoned <br />mine areas, or if it is rocky material, is shipped out of the mine on the conveyor belt and routed <br />directly to the CRDA. Only materials which cannot be placed in the CRDA due to <br />" combustibility" concerns are shipped off -site to a State approved disposal facility. Diversion of <br />any waste materials to any location other than a State approved disposal facility was done without <br />TC's knowledge or authorization. <br />Failure to dispose f non -cad zeustes in a State approzed disposal site operated in aaordance zeith local, State, and <br />Federal requirenzmts - TC's policy and practice is to contract for transport and disposal of all non- <br />coal wastes in a State approved disposal facility (Twin Landfill). Diversion of any waste materials <br />to any location other than a State approved disposal facility was done without TC's knowledge or <br />authorization. <br />Failure to conduct all surface coal mining and ra/aration operations only as described in the approzed application <br />Failure to conply zeith the terns and conditions of the permit all applicable performance standards q the A et, and <br />the requirenrnts of the Rules. - To the best of our knowledge and ability, TC has, and continues to, <br />conduct all mining and related activities according to our approved Permit and in full compliance <br />with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. <br />