Laserfiche WebLink
, 'STEVAN'L.O'BRIAN <br /><FPRESIDENT <br />October: 20, 2011 .. <br />1VIr Peter: S Hays <br />Division:of Reclamation; lVlnmg & Safety <br />1313 Sherman'St, # 21 5 <br />Denyer,,%O 80215 <br />7985 VANCE:DRIVE, SUITE <br />AR VADA, COLORADO 800 <br />303 423 7297 <br />FAX ,303 423 - 7599 `° <br />IUt ^sir► I uul amatiOr, <br />la @Gs'c S fty'.; <br />far Peter, <br />hand County Department of Road and Bridge <br />eft Fill,Notic` 1- 1977254, Granby Airport Pit M=1978'7143 , (re lm Airport <br />✓T -1995 . 004, In Point, M- 2008 =008 Red Dirt Pit, M M 2009 -64 CR #3 Pit, <br />:0 .10 _072, Grand County Reclamation Project <br />from you after w discussed- the letter on the phone <br />In general your. letter says :that Grand County must 'fire a Technical` Revision for eac <br />4 1 <br />mine listed, asthe filing of the Inert Notices constituted a revisionto the Reclamation Plan <br />each mine I diaireefiik.Ming Inert Fill Notices require a Technical Revision: Rule'3 1 5(9) <br />requires `an operator to file said notice with the Division if they intend t <br />backfill inert structural fill 'generated; outside the; approved= <br />permit area, "and it gives the Division'(office) 30 day to°respond and says the <br />operator can proceed if no response is received; <br />In this case the Notices were filed on <br />$41112011 the Divisions written' response was sent <br />ori ~9/23/1'1 (received: 9/28/11 for a or a total of 43 day This exceeds he 30day limit andI feel this <br />is no-, different. then, any other regu time limit placed on?the Division or operator' in the Rules‘.. <br />and La*, . I also: point out that the reclamation plans were no"t changed since the: imported inert <br />material wouldtbe used so supplement on' site'materiar for °slope reconstruction and growth <br />