My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-11_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2011-08-11_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:36:47 PM
Creation date
10/17/2011 12:01:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/11/2011
Doc Name
Joint Answer Brief
From
MLRB and DRMS
To
District Court
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />In August 2010, the Mined Land Reclamation Board ( "Board ") found that Cotter <br />Corporation (N.S.L.) ( "Cotter ") had violated the Mined Land Reclamation Act ( "Act ") at its <br />Schwartzwalder Mine site. The Board ordered Cotter to perform a suite of corrective actions to <br />prevent ongoing violations. Cotter refused to comply with two of those corrective actions. <br />Cotter exercised its right to seek judicial review, but did not seek a stay of the Board's Order <br />pending the Court's decision. The Board and the Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety <br />( "Division ") are each obligated to enforce violations of the Act. Since Cotter did not obtain a <br />stay of the enforcement order, both the Board and the Division took action to fulfill that mandate. <br />In November 2010, the Division brought a hearing before the Board regarding Cotter's ongoing <br />violations. After weighing the evidence, the Board assessed civil penalties and ordered Cotter to <br />cease and desist its non - compliance with corrective actions required to prevent ongoing <br />violations. Although the record contains many complicated legal arguments, the factual basis for <br />the Board's action is clear and substantial: Cotter made no attempt to comply with two of the <br />Board's corrective actions. The Board's decisions in this case should be upheld because they <br />were based upon a thorough and well- reasoned analysis of its enabling statute and regulations. <br />STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW <br />1) Whether there is a reasonable basis in law and fact to support the Board's order <br />that Cotter cease and desist its non - compliance with corrective actions required to remedy <br />violations of the Mined Land Reclamation Act. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.